Dec 05, 2009 15:25
scrub my brain,
fantasy isn't always fantastic,
kill it with fire,
i love this author but what in the world,
feminism just got set back 50 years,
so called horror,
author last names m-s,
buddy can you spare me an editor?,
there is a plot where somewhere,
thank god it was just fiction
Leave a comment
Comments 42
I said something in an earlier post on Anne Rice, I'm trying to make it through the entire series but it's hard. I'm on Merrick and honestly, since I barely finished Blood and Gold, and The Vampire Armand, it's doubtful I'll find the will to continue with the chronicles.
I've heard that the last books she's published with Lestat are completely different from the beginning of the series....but my god I had no idea how bad it would be.
I think the only later book that she published that I actually enjoyed was Pandora. I think that was because other than Marius and the mention of the other vampires at the beginning and end of the book, it was pretty much absent of the other characters that I came to be annoyed with after Queen of the Damned.
Reply
Reply
Then, in Merrick and whatnot, there's all of a sudden new vampires, wtf? Maybe she explained it somewhere, or maybe she just pulled it out of her butt. Or maybe we are supposed to assume that they all didn't adhere to the rules of not making new ones and filled the world with new vampires in the time span between Queen of the Damned and the later books? Ok, sorry for the ramble....
I think other than her inconsistencies, the big reason I cannot take the later books seriously, is because whereas the first books all take place in the past, now she is taking her creatures that she so aptly wrote for ancient times and is trying to make them "modern" and it just does not mesh.
Reply
Reply
What she needs is to learn continuity. And get a decent editor and a spell/grammar check.
Reply
I don't mind The Vampire Lestat novel. The contradictions in that one can easily be explained as a he said / she said. Two different perspectives and one character with an ego (Lestat) would of course deny that Louis saw him in the weakened condition toward the end of Interview with the vampire but the fact is it had to have happened. Lestat admitted that he had been there and in that state. So how else could Louis have known about it unless he had been there? So that contradiction fits the character as in the character, himself, denying it happened out of egotism.
However the later book contradictions (Lestat's left eye being ripped out and then in the next two books she says it's the right) are the result of Anne Rice's own ego. She doesn't use an editor anymore. I'm serious. She honestly thinks she doesn't need one now.
Reply
I also have a problem with her "Sleeping Beauty" books. First chapter started out good, but there's a difference between 'submissive' and 'dishrag with no spine'
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I am of the opinion that he should have been left comatose on the church floor (Lestat, that is). He was a great character, in the beginning, and it went so downhill. Why, Anne Rice? Why make him virtually unrecognisable? Why make a vampire turn to religion? Why make him fall in love with your other favourite character, Rowan Mayfair (who, by the way, I never liked). It was just a miserable excuse for a book.
Reply
Reply
http://www.vampires.sarawebsite.com/parodies/bloodc.html
The part in white is her mockery. The rest is REAL text from Blood Canticle's first chapter.
Reply
Leave a comment