banning words on tests

Mar 29, 2012 19:03

Divorce. Dinosaurs, Birthdays. Religion. Halloween. Christmas. Television. These are a few of the 50-plus words and references the New York City Department of Education is hoping to ban from the city’s standardized tests ( Read more... )

in the news, education

Leave a comment

Comments 57

mahsox_mahsox March 29 2012, 23:32:02 UTC
Celebrities
In-depth discussions of sports that require prior knowledge
Rap Music

OK. I'm sold on it. Those are three things my kids are certain to have less familiarity with than a sizable proportion of their peers.

Reply


thepuddingcook March 29 2012, 23:34:02 UTC
Easy solution: get rid of standardized testing. Bada bing, bada boom.

Reply

tinylegacies March 29 2012, 23:44:51 UTC
Best answer

Reply

darth_snarky March 30 2012, 00:00:33 UTC
You win.

Reply

teacentral March 30 2012, 00:43:40 UTC
Yes!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

squidger March 30 2012, 01:09:13 UTC
But it's not exactly about being non-offensive. It's about taking away potentially loaded words and trying to make standardized tests more standardized. It's not in a classroom setting where the teacher knows they may need to be particularly sensitive about certain issues; the tests are given to every student regardless of background.

Reply

seriouscookie March 30 2012, 01:41:38 UTC
Dinosaur isn't any more of a loaded word than dog. It's the name given to an animal that children learn about in science class in school.

Reply

squidger March 30 2012, 01:50:19 UTC
But children from creationist households learn completely different facts about dinosaurs at home. And if the question involves anything about when they lived or in what conditions, it probably would cause pause or hesitation.

Responding to what you agreed to below, this isn't about tests given to "people." They're given to little children who, quite possibly, can't think for themselves yet. It's not about being unoffensive or being "PC." It's a proven fact that certain groups do better on certain questions, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with trying to give all groups an equal chance. Especially considering these tests don't even really directly affect the placement of the children but rather the funding the school receives.

Reply


anne_t_social March 30 2012, 00:51:14 UTC
Eh, I don't really care how many "offensive" words they remove from tests, as long as my kid can spell the words they have left/figure out the math problems/whatever.

Reply


darth_snarky March 30 2012, 01:02:15 UTC
I'd rather have a list be too excessive than not enough. The tests are problematic enough, I support any effort to make comparisons of scores a tad more valid.

It surprises me that people who are just fine with trigger warnings all over LJ and the idea that you can't tell other people what's triggering for them can't extend the same concept to tests where the stakes are much higher.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up