...and still flurrying

Mar 15, 2015 21:07

It was all worth it just so we could receive this sophisticated graphic from the National Weather Service.


Read more... )

weather

Leave a comment

Comments 6

browngirl March 16 2015, 03:03:01 UTC
Yaaaaay.

Reply


kassrachel March 16 2015, 11:52:04 UTC
as;ldkfjasd;lfkjasdf;lkasjdf;lsakjfad

*facepalm*

Reply

bironic March 16 2015, 22:39:05 UTC
Yep. In a nutshell. :)

Reply


thirdblindmouse March 16 2015, 17:00:20 UTC
Oh hey, finally the graphic I wanted! (In the linked article.)

Reply

bironic March 16 2015, 18:03:18 UTC
The one with the duck boat? :) Or the real one with the line graph? Neither of those was included last night, although they ran earlier versions of both in other articles this winter, as you probably saw. Interesting.

p.s. I am super stoked about your robots/AIs vid show.

Reply

thirdblindmouse March 16 2015, 19:17:33 UTC
First I saw the one with the duck boat, and was deeply gratified, because since February I'd been looking for a graph (or even just the numbers) of how many inches per day we had gotten, and my searches kept turning up per-season and per-month data instead.

But as soon as I saw it, I thought, "I wish I could see a comparison with the 1995/1996 snowfall." And voilà!

I am super stoked about your robots/AIs vid show.
\o/ I will make a post about it soon.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up