3D Movies

May 30, 2011 10:00

As some of you may know, Roger Ebert has been on kind of a crusade against the recent upswing in 3D movies. He's got a blog post recently about how dim many movies are these days, even if they are 2D. Apparently, there's a reason for that.I had Friday off, and was in the mood to watch a movie at the theater. However, there was nothing new out that ( Read more... )

movies, thor

Leave a comment

Comments 14

svgurl May 31 2011, 00:00:11 UTC
I never saw Avatar but the few movies I have seen in 3D weren't worth it. I honestly don't get why everyone is heading in that direction, especially with movies that really don't need to be in 3D. :\

Reply

beck_liz May 31 2011, 23:47:58 UTC
especially with movies that really don't need to be in 3D

You know we'll be in trouble if they start advertising "Hamlet --- in 3-D!!!!"

Reply


mcamy May 31 2011, 16:07:03 UTC
3D always has a chance of making me seasick. So we always go to 2D. The first night of Pirates in my town, at 6:15, was packed. Though it looked like the lines for the 3D were long, too.

I liked Up in 3D, but it doesn't lose anything when its in 2D, for my money. That may be the last thing I saw in 3D.

Reply

beck_liz May 31 2011, 23:49:36 UTC
I don't know about seasick, although it's possible the 3D effects in Thor were so minimal I didn't even notice. Prone to increasing the (already-strong) likelihood of my getting a headache? Oh, yeah.

I could definitely see Up as being a nice movie for 3D, but it was great in 2D, too.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up