I guess you all heard the hoopla about Professor Darryl Bem at Cornell getting his ESP experiments into a peer-reviewed journal. Not even close to crackpot in his other work, he has demonstrated that some psychological tests work backwards, as if the subjects had fore-knowledge of the next events in the experiment
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
It's not exactly a whopping result, but it is curious that Bem found one at all. I'd definitely want to see these results replicated, independently, with some reliability. I, too, questioned whether these results could be attributed, in some way, to the use of pseudorandom number generation, but I understand (from Watts' comments) that Bem, apparently, tried to account for its use ( ... )
Reply
It made me think of a tv show years ago where siamese fighting fish were seperated from an opponent by a glass insert that would be raised on a schedule dictated by a true random number generator using radioactive decay. When tested, the apparatus raised the insert more often when there was a male fish on either side of the glass. The strange question this begs is: how did the siamese fighting fish get the RNG to raise the insert more often?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment