Women.

Feb 22, 2006 20:36

Something else I thought would interest some of you:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/22/dakota.abortion.ap/index.html

I still can't figure out why people think this is a good idea.

link

Leave a comment

Comments 7

parab0lic February 23 2006, 04:23:58 UTC
::shakes head:: It's just going to force women to have back alley abortions and risk serious infections. Plus, how is anyone to know if the woman was raped, or involved in an incestual relationship? It's just a bad idea. Women need to have options. If they don't want to have a baby and give it up for adoption, they shouldn't have to just because Baby Bush says they do.

This makes me irate.

Reply

christianbeauty February 23 2006, 04:25:56 UTC
Baby Bush? *lol*

Reply

small_thoughts February 23 2006, 05:19:14 UTC
That user icon kicks ass.

Reply

christianbeauty February 23 2006, 05:20:26 UTC
*hahaha* Thanks.:) I ♥ it too.:)

Reply


small_thoughts February 23 2006, 05:18:35 UTC
Everyone knows that women aren't smart enough to make decisions about their own bodies. It's up to the government to protect them from themselves, because the government knows best. Besides, whether you have a "proper" abortion or a back-alley abortion, you're going to Hell either way.

Heathens.

Reply


ftmwolfcasey February 24 2006, 17:28:13 UTC
Of course, South Dakota has never been on the cutting edge of progress.

It's none of the government's damned business anyway.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up