Of white skirts, food cravings and other oddities

Dec 01, 2005 20:33

Has anyone read the letter to the editor in Inquirer on Wednesday complaining about Soc Sci 3? If you have, please feel free to stomp on it. I know he's entitled to his own opinion but telling people not to take a class that can furthur their understanding of others is just bull. My whole class will be sending a rebuttal. Take that ( Read more... )

blogthings, life, la lang

Leave a comment

Comments 13

galenalistova December 1 2005, 12:48:57 UTC
Sir Aureus kept talking about lumpia today.
OMG is this Sir Ulysses M. Aureus the not so chubby philo teacher who likes anime so much?

Reply

ballerynna December 1 2005, 14:50:16 UTC
Um.. no. But I think my prof and your prof are related somewhat

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

ballerynna December 1 2005, 14:49:40 UTC
And apparently the letter sender belongs to a group that supposedly does not tolerate homosexuals. I now wonder at the validity of his complaints. Purely value-judgement, he hasn't even tried the sibject yet.

Reply


blu_frenchfries December 1 2005, 13:43:03 UTC
My Soc Sci 3 prof told us to read this, with a knowing smirk, and advised us to "form our own opinions on it".

My opinion? He's entitled to it, but only AFTER he's tried the course. Know what you're talking about, at least.

Of course, I read this right after watching the Kinsey: Let's Talk About Sex film, where they discussed why wilful ignorance harms not only you, but other people - and the place of a sex course in unis. Hayy. Wish I could strap this guy down and make him watch it.

Reply

ballerynna December 1 2005, 14:52:50 UTC
One of my classmates in Soc Sci 3 said that he agrees to some points of the letter and that if he wasn't taking the class he would've said the same things. But now that he's enrolled he's realized that there are things that one should learn from the class.

I think people immediately assume that Soc Sci 3 and even Pan Pil 19 teaches students sexual deviancy or sexual positiions when the classes look at different things

Reply

onesideofjess December 2 2005, 09:01:54 UTC
Wish I could strap this guy down...
I hoped that the clause that came after this would be kinky. Aww.
*disapointment*

Reply

ballerynna December 2 2005, 10:30:10 UTC
Gee Jess, so that's how you think...

Reply


prickster December 1 2005, 15:03:14 UTC
Check out the first draft of my reply. It's on my LJ. I was really angry when I wrote it.

The final draft (after much editing) is on my PC. Sent it int na. I hope they publish it.

Reply

ballerynna December 2 2005, 10:31:25 UTC
They'll publish it don't worry. Apparently that letter has even been the cause of much bruohaha at the Psych department. Dra. Holmes said that many profs questioned what was being taught

Reply


kimsam December 1 2005, 15:04:34 UTC
Oh my God you look like a frog. Oh my God you look like a frog!Umbridge you're going down, Umbridge you're going down!

and about the Soc Sci3 bashing --

either the guy is still living in the Victorian age, or he's squarer than Spongebob's pants.

im sure the guy is very unpopular now. not that i don't blame him, he should have taken the class before he said nasty things about it.

Reply

ballerynna December 2 2005, 10:31:52 UTC
Very very unpopular, the turd

Reply


Leave a comment

Up