Has anyone read the letter to the editor in Inquirer on Wednesday complaining about Soc Sci 3? If you have, please feel free to stomp on it. I know he's entitled to his own opinion but telling people not to take a class that can furthur their understanding of others is just bull. My whole class will be sending a rebuttal. Take that
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
OMG is this Sir Ulysses M. Aureus the not so chubby philo teacher who likes anime so much?
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
My opinion? He's entitled to it, but only AFTER he's tried the course. Know what you're talking about, at least.
Of course, I read this right after watching the Kinsey: Let's Talk About Sex film, where they discussed why wilful ignorance harms not only you, but other people - and the place of a sex course in unis. Hayy. Wish I could strap this guy down and make him watch it.
Reply
I think people immediately assume that Soc Sci 3 and even Pan Pil 19 teaches students sexual deviancy or sexual positiions when the classes look at different things
Reply
I hoped that the clause that came after this would be kinky. Aww.
*disapointment*
Reply
Reply
The final draft (after much editing) is on my PC. Sent it int na. I hope they publish it.
Reply
Reply
and about the Soc Sci3 bashing --
either the guy is still living in the Victorian age, or he's squarer than Spongebob's pants.
im sure the guy is very unpopular now. not that i don't blame him, he should have taken the class before he said nasty things about it.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment