I survived the Histories Cycle! :-D Although unlike my first assumption that it would be 'binge-watching Shakespeare', it was more like 'Shakespeare boot camp'. There was a play at 10:30, a play at 3:00, and a play at 7:30, and they were all either three hours and ten minutes (twenty-minute intermission) or three hours and twenty minutes. 'Twas a
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
So, does the RSC also go for pseudo-medieval in everything that they do? (Except for Richard III, though I'd never heard about the Richard III=Nazi Germany relation until now.) Har har, our tackiness is not alone.
Reply
Not that that needed so much emphasis...
A lot of times they do. Or else a sort of Pseudo-something that seems to defy time periods. I bought a good book of their Complete Works Festival 'yearbook' and it gives a good idea. They do a few crazy things, a few authentic, a few real Elizabethan, but mostly pseudo medieval/something else. It works well for them. Better than pseudo-nazi anyway. :-)
No, I kid you not! Shakespeare withdrawal. It's painful.
Reply
However, kingship and democracy tend to degenerate into tyranny, aristocracy into oligarchy, so what's best for most cities is the corrupted/degenerate form of democracy, which he calls polity. This is similar to what we would call a republic.
So while true kingship is best, it's not usually possible; while aristocracy is also good, it's also difficult to achieve; and so polity, for most cities, is the best of all probable options.
. . . .
Shakespeare! Right, Shakespeare.
Eh, don't sell Henry V short. I think it's less about England vs. France than it is about Hal and whether or not he can really be a king. His father's dead, he had to cut himself off from Falstaff, nobody ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment