JKR's decision to reveal that Dumbledore is gay has been rightly acclaimed as courageous. For a children's writer to even think, without revealing, that a major story character is gay reveals an important step in tolerance. Shortly after outing Albus, JKR went on to emphasize that Harry, in the magical world, had to face all the problems of the
(
Read more... )
Comments 19
as much as i sympathised with their desire to see harry/ron or any of the other much loved ships be included, i was a little bewildered at the strength of their response.
because at no point did she point to making the series about that. i think there is a bunch of subtext (including dumbledore which i think was there for a lot of the series!) but it was never about that ( ... )
Reply
And yet... hmmm... In a way, I don't quite agree with you. But I don't exactly disagree either. Let me try to say what I mean, but if I mess it up, come back.
Two points. The first is a bit of an accuracy thing.
"...she was writing from her standpoint. she doesn't live on that particular aspect of society. she doesn't live where it is the key issue."
Ah, but she does. I can't quite agree, here, though it's enormously clear that, in UK, gays are accorded much more respect and more rights than here in most of the US. But she's not just writing, she's writing for. In particular, she's not just writing for the UK and more progressive parts or peoples of the world. She's also writing for the US, very much so ( ... )
Reply
Ah, but she does. I can't quite agree, here, though it's enormously clear that, in UK, gays are accorded much more respect and more rights than here in most of the US. But she's not just writing, she's writing for. In particular, she's not just writing for the UK and more progressive parts or peoples of the world. She's also writing for the US, very much so.
i still will disagree slightly with you here ( ... )
Reply
And again, I'm not angry in any sense, or upset with JKR -- how dumb would that be? She's just done a beautiful thing, and taken a step forward. No step forward should ever be put down, even if, of course, we don't want to stop there. (See what happens if you're walking and all of a sudden stop, right?)
And thank goodness you have your important "audience", and please keep that. Mine is, mostly, abused & neglected children. And I'd never give up that. Though tolerance & love, even embracing, there, is tricker in some ways. Indeed, in some ways, much, much trickier, and I'll spend the rest of my professional career working that out.
Reply
Reply
...I continue to think that it's a bit unfair to put that task on JKR. If I may use a baseball analogy (you'll be cheering for the Rockies, no doubt), it's a bit like asking her to hit a homerun in her first major league at bat. And in fact, what I think she did was simply to put the ball in play. As is evidenced by the widespread opinions in the HP fandom on this topic, I think she would only have served to alienate the [parents of] the very people who most need to learn tolerance.
Absolutely! I agree. You could paste it on the top of my essay, here, and I'd be glad to include it, even to sign it. Yes, yes, yes.
Now let me, as I did with mrsquizzical, put a little disagreement in here. But I stress, it's only a little disagreement:
Perhaps Harry Potter isn't the appropriate vehicle for making a social commentary, but she knows (because of the fact that her audience applauded when she said it) that there is a certain portion of her audience that ( ... )
Reply
*sigh*
Reply
Reply
May we find, as we often have, ways to come together on other important matters.
Reply
Thank you.
Reply
May your life have an abudance of loving tolerance in it!
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I hope you and Jane are doing well.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment