These two were pretty solid, as well: * 1956 Yul Brynner - The King and I as King Mongkut of Siam o James Dean - Giant as Jett Rink (posthumous nomination) o Kirk Douglas - Lust for Life as Vincent Van Gogh o Rock Hudson - Giant as "Bick Benedict" o Laurence Olivier - Richard III as Richard III
* 1982 Ben Kingsley - Gandhi as Mahatma Gandhi o Dustin Hoffman - Tootsie as Michael Dorsey / Dorothy Michaels o Jack Lemmon - Missing as Ed Horman o Paul Newman - The Verdict as Frank Galvin o Peter O'Toole - My Favorite Year as Alan Swann
It's pretty amazing how frequently Peter O'Toole and Jack Lemmon got nominated from the 1950s through the 1990s.
I don't know if you remember my little kick about three years ago when I decided to correct my mis-impressions about 1950s cinema? I had had the mistaken idea that it was all stiff and anti-intellectual (because McCarthyism had rendered art impossible).
Well, Jack Lemmon is one of those people I had to totally rethink as a result of that self-imposed attitude adjustment. I had always thought of him as strictly a light comic actor and, hence, not good. Boy, was I wrong!
It's true -- 1982 is a long way from the start for both of those guys. I think Lemmon's a seriously good actor. He's done two performances which have annoyed me to no end -- Days of Wine & Roses and The Out-of-Towners -- but I think it's because he played these really annoying characters SO WELL that it bugged me.
Comments 4
These two were pretty solid, as well:
* 1956 Yul Brynner - The King and I as King Mongkut of Siam
o James Dean - Giant as Jett Rink (posthumous nomination)
o Kirk Douglas - Lust for Life as Vincent Van Gogh
o Rock Hudson - Giant as "Bick Benedict"
o Laurence Olivier - Richard III as Richard III
* 1982 Ben Kingsley - Gandhi as Mahatma Gandhi
o Dustin Hoffman - Tootsie as Michael Dorsey / Dorothy Michaels
o Jack Lemmon - Missing as Ed Horman
o Paul Newman - The Verdict as Frank Galvin
o Peter O'Toole - My Favorite Year as Alan Swann
Reply
I don't know if you remember my little kick about three years ago when I decided to correct my mis-impressions about 1950s cinema? I had had the mistaken idea that it was all stiff and anti-intellectual (because McCarthyism had rendered art impossible).
Well, Jack Lemmon is one of those people I had to totally rethink as a result of that self-imposed attitude adjustment. I had always thought of him as strictly a light comic actor and, hence, not good. Boy, was I wrong!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment