Deathly Hallows: Part I

Nov 27, 2010 08:06

Ultimately I thought it was pretty good, especially compared to the other movies.

Spoilers )

deathly hallows, films, harry potter movies, ron/hermione, remus/tonks

Leave a comment

Comments 16

akashasheiress November 27 2010, 17:03:53 UTC
Yeah, I don't have a problem with them showing that Harry and Hermione love each other. Friendship, as JKR no doubt agrees, is not ''lesser'' than romance.

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 01:06:58 UTC
Yeah, and I think the books do a lot to emphasize that. I mean, the entire point of Sirius's character was his (platonic) love for Harry's father.

Reply


r_a_black November 27 2010, 18:32:08 UTC
This was my own ramble: clicky.

In the book, that's the point Tonks is supposed to tell Harry that they got married, so that's what I'm assuming she was going to say. I don't know how they'll add Teddy in now though.

The barista was knocked out with the two DEs in the coffee shop, so the real odd thing was that Hermione told her to run rather than trying to modify her memory.

I feel the same about the dance. There were moments were it seemed very platonic and other moments where their faces were just too close for comfort.

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 01:09:41 UTC

I didn't know you had another LJ!

In the book, that's the point Tonks is supposed to tell Harry that they got married, so that's what I'm assuming she was going to say.

Yeah, same. It didn't occur to me that it might be otherwise until I saw other people's reviews.

Reply

r_a_black November 28 2010, 01:50:14 UTC
I have another LJ? Wait, what?

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 04:11:08 UTC
You know what, I think I clicked on something else by mistake when I clicked on that link, because yeah, I came to another person's entry about the movie. Maybe someone on your flist? I forget the name. But yeah, I was very confused.

Reply


steampen November 27 2010, 20:49:26 UTC
I definitely don't think there was a ditzy barista, but I liked that added touch, even though 1997's way too early for iPods. (Which I believe she was listening to.) She should have been holding a portable CD player.

I totally forgot the movies were supposed to be happening in 1997. In all honesty, I don't know if they meant to set in at that time, because Hermione is wearing skinny jeans and ballerina flats, which were pretty much unheard of back then.

On one hand, it definitely felt like they were a bit too close to be platonic. On the other hand, that may have just been me knowing Kloves is a Harry/Hermione shipper.

Well, in the movie theater people's reactions were ranging from "LOL" to "awwww". I got the distinct feeling everyone thought it was silly and unimportant, and neither my boyfriend or my buddy commented on it, while they did comment on the lack of Ginny. So I think that might be fandom's nefarious influence speaking.

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 14:00:49 UTC
I totally forgot the movies were supposed to be happening in 1997. In all honesty, I don't know if they meant to set in at that time, because Hermione is wearing skinny jeans and ballerina flats, which were pretty much unheard of back then.

Good point. Plus, that means the first movie should have taken place in 1991, and nobody had early 90s hair styles, so that doesn't work. I'm not even sure we knew the books were supposed to start in the early 90s until after the movies were being made. I always found it strange that JKR never mentioned it in the books. Then again, she also never mentions that they take place in the Scottish highlands, but if you do the geographical analysis it's apparently pretty obvious.

Reply


anonymous November 27 2010, 21:00:51 UTC
tdu000 November 27 2010, 21:01:18 UTC
That should have been "dancing" of course!

Reply

kakeochi_umai November 28 2010, 06:02:53 UTC
LOL, I first read it as "farting" and pictured Harry and Hermione doing something like Terence and Philip in the South Park movie.

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 14:05:06 UTC
nfortunately, the Remus-Tonks relationship is pretty much expendable as far as the plot goes - it's only the symbolism of the orphaned baby boy who gets to grow up surrounded by love that is significant and even that isn't really important plotwise.

Yeah, exactly. It was even expendable in the book - I appreciate JKR's intentions, but I didn't get any symbolism out of Teddy being a war orphan. There is one line where Harry briefly likens himself to Sirius, but it's too easy to not really take it in because it's in the middle of all this other stuff going on. I can't even remember when it happened, just that I'm pretty sure Harry was still at Shell Cottage.

Reply


linda_lupos November 27 2010, 22:28:10 UTC
I was under the impression that she was going to say that she was pregnant: it came off as "oh, and another thing!" but then Moody shut her up.
I did really like how much they interacted in the background (I saw it for a second time this evening and yes, I did pay extra attention to them now). At Privet Drive, there's little moments where they touch, or they stay close together. And then there's that wonderful hug/glomp/grab when Tonks arrives at the Burrow, and they just don't let go, even when the attention's on the other characters by then ( ... )

Reply

author_by_night November 28 2010, 14:06:10 UTC
And then I noticed that at Bill and Fleur's wedding, when Harry was talking to Aunt Whatsherface, Tonks and Remus were in the background talking to Molly

I didn't notice that, but that's sweet.

How sad was Dobby! I actually teared up when he died! It really helped that the CGI has really improved, so he felt a lot realer than he did in CoS. He had body language and all that. He got some great laughs, too, at Grimmauld Place and at Malfoy Manor - which turned out to be so sad as he died only a minute later.

Yeah, that was awful.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up