Stranger Whan We CAN Imagine: The Return of the ÆTHER!

Mar 07, 2010 20:05

Posted for future reference:

The Key to Quantum Gravity May Lie in the Æther.

Expect the TIMECUBE crazies and the anti-science types who think that the Big Bang is part of "Darwinism" to jump all over this, shrieking, "See? Einstein was wrong!" and insulting the intelligence of everyone who doesn't immediately see that this proves their own ( Read more... )

reference, mad science, aether, science

Leave a comment

Comments 8

araquan March 8 2010, 04:32:32 UTC
You can't really satisfy anyone who sees the falsifiability of theories as a weakness of the system. Supplanting older knowledge with newer, more correct knowledge (which this will have to prove itself to be, but it may yet do so) is a bug, not a feature, to people like that.

But then look at the position they're arguing from.

Reply


cpxbrex March 8 2010, 06:12:38 UTC
I'll believe it when they do something with it, hehe. Has anyone else noticed that all these unifications of quantum and relativistic gravity always start with the assumption that there's something wrong with relativity? Maybe it's because there's about 10,000% more money in quantum than relativity. :p

Reply

Finally! An appropriate opportunity to use this icon! athelind March 8 2010, 06:22:31 UTC
... no, I haven't noticed that. Most of the attempts at Theories of Everything I've seen assume (within the limits of my layman's understanding) that both relativity and quantum mechanics are pretty solid within their respective domains, and then get caught up trying to build bridges. Actually, almost all of them operate under the assumption that the randomness of quantum effect just magically disappear on the macro-scale, blah blah blah statistics blah observation blah blah waveform collapse, so it's really quite the opposite, as far as I can follow.

(Added opportune link!)

Reply

Re: Finally! An appropriate opportunity to use this icon! cpxbrex March 8 2010, 06:36:09 UTC
Oh, no. You look at those TOEs and all of them are started by and largely researched by quantum physicists. Like with string theory - very quantum centered as research priorities. You look at the CVs of someone like Leondard Suskind and you'll see it's all about chromodynamics and hadrons. And Horava is definitely a quantum guy. It's hard to find anyone involved in TOE who has astronomy as their primary focus. Overwhelmingly, the people who come up with the TOEs and who work on them are quantum physics guys.

Reply

Re: Finally! An appropriate opportunity to use this icon! athelind March 8 2010, 16:16:56 UTC
Yeah, but they're usually trying to reconcile their side of things with relativity, because relativity makes a whole lot of rigorous predictions that have been successfully confirmed.

Reply


siege March 8 2010, 07:13:35 UTC
Einstein was right; even he was uncertain about this.

Reply


paka March 8 2010, 08:42:36 UTC
I can see how it would be useful to have an absolute and a relative model for examining time, because if you're thinking about changes due to gravity, distance and velocity, especially near a starting point, that sounds really very fluid - and in that sense, absolute would be equivalent to laminar flow and relative to turbulent flow.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up