Thanks for your answers, those who responded to my previous question. I am at home now, on my computer, old as it is, I'm used to it. (I borrowed a nifty littke EEE but it was impossible to type on without constant error
( Read more... )
One thing that tends to help with multiple-person typing jobs (speaking as someone who has post-processed the results of such outsourced contract jobs a few times, professionally, whee!) is to have two or three people type the same content. If there's enough of us (and I'm willing to contribute some time as well--I go about 90 WPM), then we could probably manage two people for most/all of the book. Then someone "runs a diff"--compares the results against each other, and looks for disparities; it is unusual statistically for 2+ typists to make exactly the same errors if they're moderately careful typists. And then, ideally, someone reads the way a proofreader would, to catch things that typists might indeed fudge (period for a comma, e.g., on either Qwerty or Dvorak layouts
( ... )
That is, compares the results with computer aid. :P "diff" is actually a unix program that flags every single difference, including spaces; there are similar programs with easier-to-use interfaces. Anyhow.
Apparently I'm not reading carefully enough because I missed the Coronets and Steel part the first time. Yay! That is awesome. So is the news about Banner (!), but I did enjoy the draft of C&S you posted a while ago.
I'd definitely be willing to give you the file I used to make the CD book! But it's an Adobe InDesign file, I don't know what format or program you want the text in, and how easy or hard it would be to convert it. :/ I hate to think of you typing up the whole book again. That was one option I was considering myself, before I got access to an OCR scanner (which at times wasn't good because it was a quick scan, but it got the job done), and I wasn't looking forward to it at all.
I would love it. If one can "select all" and "copy" then the file could be dumped into an rtf. file. I hope. It would be perfect, because I could work with that, and make one more pass on the little errors.
Comments 47
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yes--sartorias at gmail dot com.
Thank you!
Reply
Leave a comment