So about Thor 2!
My broad review is that this movie forked over a heap of fannish catnip, which makes me very happy as a fan, but was kind of a mess and badly written, which drives me mad as a writer. So a lot of this is going to be critical! If that will harsh your buzz, give it a miss!
(
spoilers )
Comments 14
I couldn't tell if that was Loki making an illusion for himself, or Frigga going behind Odin's back and visiting via projection, because she was an illusionist too.
I am very pleased to hear that was catnip to you. :-D
Reply
That's what I thought too. Especially since she appears later in the same dress to greet Thor.
Reply
Reply
THANK YOU for calling the film out on this! I've been stewing over this for well over a week, wondering if it was me. No, it's not and it deserves a good smack for wasting Rene Russo and Christopher Eccleston (whom I love and adore). I'd also add Idris Elba but at least he got more to do this time but you can never have too much Heimdall for my liking - still would like to know whether he's at his rightful place, mind... and not seducing Australian DILFs and cancelling the apocalypse!
Bad movie - no cookie.
The whole 'Thor goes on the Tube' threw me right out of the film... mainly because I was trying to work out how you get from Charing Cross (pretty much the centre of London!) to Greenwich - it's a lot longer than three stops - trust me.
Heck, even the New Statesman got in on the act - Hollywood's rubbish tube geography in Thor:The Dark World
Reply
Reply
I'm with the others that I was thinking it was Frigga's projection to Loki, not Loki's own illusion.
Reply
Leave a comment