This is important

Oct 16, 2012 18:18

A vampire sucks the blood of someone who's HIV+. Would the vampire develop AIDS? Would the vampire die? If not die, would the vampire get weakened or show any sort of symptoms?

totally not hypothetical

Leave a comment

Comments 26

policraticus October 16 2012, 22:21:50 UTC
Vampires are the undead. The operative word there is DEAD.

Reply


rgpick October 16 2012, 22:22:50 UTC
Vampires are immune to normal diseases so the HIV wouldn't have an effect on them.

Reply

mofoburrell October 16 2012, 22:23:52 UTC
Are there any diseases for vampires? Maybe it could mutate into VIV.

Reply

rgpick October 16 2012, 22:26:26 UTC
Unless you want to call their need to consume blood a disease, I don't think so.

Reply

nextdrinksonme October 16 2012, 23:13:47 UTC
In True Blood, there's some form of Hep that affects vamps.

Reply


khemlab October 16 2012, 22:25:01 UTC
The vampire could only develop AIDS if it had an immune system to begin with. Do vampires get colds, flus, tuberculosis, that kind of thing? A survey of recent literature points to "no." But does that mean the vampire lacks an immune system, or that its immune system is super-awesome? I would argue that the answer is irrelevant. No immune system, no AIDS. Super immune system, no AIDS.

But this leads to the more important question - what about subsequent feedings? Would the vampire, in addition to draining its victim of blood, also infect said victim with HIV? Are fang condoms even a possibility?

Reply

raze__the_rose October 16 2012, 23:19:57 UTC
I highly doubt that a lack of immune system would lead to a lack of infection. Quite the opposite, I should think.

Reply

khemlab October 16 2012, 23:24:31 UTC
While I appreciate your scientific and medical opinion, Dr. Rose, what exactly would the HIV virus attack if there was no immune system in the first place?

Reply

raze__the_rose October 16 2012, 23:49:51 UTC
I wasn't referring to the HIV infection specifically. A mention was made of the flu, etc, and these would certainly wreak havok in a person who had no way to fight them off. But you're probably right that a person without T cells wouldn't get HIV...

Reply


cat_the_knife October 16 2012, 22:25:17 UTC
In that scenario, I imagine the blood being of a quality level that's not particularly good. It might taste bad to the vampire or not give him as much energy as healthier blood... but no, he wouldn't get sick or show symptoms.

And LOL @ "totally not hypothetical".

Reply


toppertje October 16 2012, 22:26:38 UTC
Assuming vampires have no immune system, or at least one that repairs the body quickly (they do seem to in True Blood), I think they would be alright.

Perhaps it would be comparable to food poisoning.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up