first minute [Voice/Video]

Dec 14, 2011 14:29

[There's the sound of fumbling as someone seems to be trying to get the braclet to work- however, the video function doesn't turn on yet, and all you can hear is the voice of a man.]

Huh, some sort of screen. Er, no no no, wait, I shouldn't get distracted by this. Please, miss maid, there must be some mistake! I can't stay here.

[The man sounds ( Read more... )

cheriour, re: the witness, re: seth clearwater, re: euridice taverna, re: sam winchester, re: vriska serket, re: lycoris, re: castiel

Leave a comment

Comments 227

video unenlightening December 14 2011, 19:37:19 UTC
[You have clocks for eyes.

Lycoris isn't sure if that is awesome or kind of weird. Kind of leaning towards the former.

She is focusing on the eyes mostly because most of everything else in the feed pretty much flew over her head.]

-- How do you see?

Reply

video clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:40:25 UTC
[Oh! There's a person on the other end of this thing. Cheriour cocks his head like a curious bird.]

I see because the systems behind the gears of the clocks have been modified for absorbing light and they are integrated with the optic nerves...and wait. Why am I talking about this?

Who are you?

Reply

video unenlightening December 14 2011, 19:43:25 UTC
[WELP

That just flew over her head too.]

'Cause I asked. And I'm Lycoris!

Reply

Video clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:46:18 UTC
Um, yes, yes you did! Sorry, I'm just not in the right state of mind for answering questions too well.

Hello, then, Lycoris. I'm Cheriour, angel of the Lord. Are you in the same situation as me?

Reply


audio; occulthymns December 14 2011, 19:43:04 UTC
[Hey, another guy who lost his wings! For a second Euri's wondering if he's another dragon like Alduin (he was talking about losing his wings, after all) but upon seeing those eyes her mind is turning to another explanation.]

Hey! You look pretty advanced for a golem....

Reply

Video clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:44:19 UTC
[And yet another person. And she's calling him a golem. Cheriour frowns, sounding rather affronted.]

Excuse me, I'm an angel. Not a golem.

Reply

audio; occulthymns December 14 2011, 19:49:07 UTC
[Psshh, ridiculous.]

But angels don't talk. Or have creepy clock-eyes.

Reply

Video clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:50:41 UTC
[What is this girl going on about? Speaking such ridiculous things.]

Um, yes they do. I have no idea what kind of angels you have been talking to, but we speak! And these eyes aren't creepy.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:53:35 UTC
Erm, thank you sir.

[He sighs.]

Usually asking people nicely gets them to consider your position, at least. But this maid doesn't seem to react to anything I'm saying. Maybe I have to talk with this Mr. Heimdall if he's he one in charge.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

clockeyes December 14 2011, 19:58:01 UTC
[He just arrived, it's to be expected. 8I]

...Well, that's inconvenient. Is there anyone in charge I can talk to?

Reply


[text] katlocked December 14 2011, 20:10:40 UTC
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOUR EYES?

Reply

[text] clockeyes December 14 2011, 20:15:19 UTC
[Ooh, text! Cheriour makes a move to reply but realizes he still has no idea how this screen works yet and just stick with video.]

Nothing's wrong with them. They're clocks.

Reply

[text] katlocked December 14 2011, 20:23:01 UTC
I'M PRETTY SURE THAT CONSTITUTES AS "SOMETHING WRONG" IN TROLL BOOKS, AND IT'S A SAFE BET THAT IT'S WRONG IN HUMAN BOOKS, TOO.
HOW ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO SEE OUT OF CLOCKS?
THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.

Reply

[Video] clockeyes December 14 2011, 20:27:57 UTC
Trolls? What do trolls have to do with anything? And I'm not human, I'm an angel. Therefore it is right in angel books.

I can see due to highly complicated mechanisms that allow me to take in light and convert it into visual information, that's how.

Reply


text also I SWEAR I THOUGHT THAT WAS A WORD bearswitness December 14 2011, 20:15:11 UTC
Welcome to normality.

Reply

text ME TOO why isn't it clockeyes December 14 2011, 20:16:03 UTC
[And this guy is also getting the video treatment because WHAT IS TECHNOLOGY HOW DOES IT WORK.]

This is...normal?

Reply

/INVENTS bearswitness December 14 2011, 20:19:32 UTC
Not having wings tends to be yes. Can you see with those clocks?

Reply

/PUTS IN DICTIONARY clockeyes December 14 2011, 20:20:32 UTC
Oh! Oh, I understand now.

[A nod.] Of course I can? If I couldn't then I would be blind.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up