See? Not as late as July! Go me!
Cutting for major spoilers and some space. May come back and cut for space more once I post this and see how much space it hogs.
(Nine books. Nine. Shoot. Granted, some of them were short, but others were five hundred pages. Probably won't read this many novels again until I get another insane commute like August
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
::cackles::
It's not just Ringo's Covert Ops people. He likes _all_ his protagonists to be pragmatic, ruthless and grimly amused. It's likely to keep them alive longer in combat zones (which is where Ringo tends to drop them).
OTOH, I'd imagine all covert ops people have radically different assumptions than yours...otherwise the CIA would be trying to recruit you too. It's not a job for just anyone you know. ;-)
______________
Re: Sino-Islamic Total War
I hold that a proportional percentage of the economy probably was pumped straight into the war effort - total war, remember?- and so would have drained it as fast or nearly so.It's a matter of industrial base. Both the factories and resources of the two combatants were _far_ behind the front lines and not subject to bombing until the very end. Also, the Country-size to Trench-length ratio is much ( ... )
Reply
No kidding.
China and Dar al Islam are both _tremendously_ bigger than England and Germany, and equally larger in relation to the Front (if I'm conveying this right).
I see what you're saying. However, wasn't Dar al Islam presented as only loosely unified when the war started? A federalist (?) government, or even more like allied states, rather than a centralized government with associated centralized powers? It's an inefficient way to run a war, and they could have eventually engaged more central planning, but if China started out with a more centralized economy it might have been able to beat out Dar al Islam before the Muslims could pull together.
::waves hands in magical economic handwaving::Keep that breeze coming. I don't care what the weather's like, hauling thirty pounds of chemistry book around campus would make me sweat during a ( ... )
Reply
Thanks for bringing Service of the Sword to my attention; don't know how that slipped by me. (I do read a few other folks, but nobody blows 'em up like Mr. Weber).
Reply
Book critic? Me? This is off-the-cuff whinging about the bad stuff and ecstatic one-liners about the good stories. Book critics grow up and turn into tedious Post Book Week employees. (They're currently on the List of Authority Wannabes. Any major magazine that manages to read "Anathema Device" as "Anastasia Device" in their Good Omens review deserves my mockery and non-respect.)
I also suspect book critics are *shudder* english majors.
Thanks for bringing Service of the Sword to my attention; don't know how that slipped by me. (I do read a few other folks, but nobody blows 'em up like Mr. Weber).
No problem. Like I said, it's a mix of strong and middling stories. Worth checking out of the library or buying used, or possibly buying in paperback, depending on your entertainment budget.
Reply
Thanks for reminding me - I'll have to do a once-over for formatting and obnoxious netspeak, but that should leave me plenty of time to get to to Sam before October.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(I missed you at Torcon - is DC really up for a Worldcon bid?)
later, ...
Reply
Yes, Paths was very good. I love being able to put books on hold as soon as the library buys them...
Reply
Leave a comment