Of all the choices George W. has made over the past six years, the only one I can honestly say I would applaud was his choice of Ted Kooser as Poet Laureate. I love the man's work. If you've received email from me over the last year or so, one of his poems is my sig. Simple. Beautiful. Evocative
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
I'm not fond of slam poetry either, but my failure to appreciate it doesn't invalidate its worth as poetry goes.
Reply
Reply
As with all things artistic, good poetry is subjective, and difficult (impossible?) to quantify. If you enjoy an author's work, then who am I to tell you it sucks (especially since I've never read any of Kooser's poetry). I do think that you are in essence disagreeing in part with the reviewer, while still pointing out the key element: poetry (and literature, and art, and and and) has the possibility of being available to everyone. I'm just concerned that the cost of doing so turns poetry into the literary version of Summer Blockbuster Movies.
Reply
I don't think Kooser is advocating the homogenization of poetry at all, but I could be wrong. In fact, I think I won't speak for him on the matter. But what I'm talking about is poetry of and for common life. Poetry about living rather than poetry that somehow requires GRAND THOUGHTS and IMPORTANT IDEAS.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment