i was originally supposed to post this last wednesday, but i decided to wait a week after two of the people i spoke to had not watched it yet. while i haven't asked them, i am hoping the extra 6 days were enough time for them to do so
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
the interesting thing is that what i responded to the most about it (the strange, douglas-sirk-y "happy ending" sequence that concludes it) isn't evewn mentioned in your analysis, but fits perfectly with what you've described.
someday, i hope someone writes the nuanced, warts-and-all analysis of spike lee that he deserves. something other than golf-clapping for do the right thing followed by what an asshole he is for tweeting george zimmerman's inaccurate address, etc.
Reply
Reply
also liked how that junkie who begs norton in the beginning is shown to have just been some regular dude in a suit in that flashback at the playground. i didn't really mind the fact that you never see monty dealing, since i didn't want the movie to be all NEVER FORGET HE'S A BAD PERSON but that was a rather nifty way to handle the unseen business end of his story.
Reply
Reply
this is an open wound of a movie. like it's more than vulnerable; it's kind of dirty, unpleasant too.
It serves as a nice companion piece with Raising Arizona, another film that ends with an "american dream" style picture of domesticity, but whereas that one is comforting despite the wink that accompanies it, this one ends up laying bare the sacrifices of others that it took to build it. sort of like a non western unforgiven. it's a wild, violent world out there.
time's a good point; there's a surprising lack of urgency for a man's last day. i mean he has time to remember all 1000 syllables in the word shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit in his flashback. that's some slow shit. powerful shit too.
i bet prison's a lot more fun than they pretend.
Reply
Leave a comment