'And' is a conjunction, 'with' is a preposition--but otherwise, nothin', I'd say. They both denote an accompanyment--I mean, you can easily I say, "I went with Stinky McShoebuckle to Watership Down last Saturday," or "Stinky McShoebuckle and I went to Watership Down last Saturday"--and it means the same exact thing. You would probably never say either of those things, but nonetheless. It's just a matter of a compound-noun-thingy or an adverbial phrase.
I also really get the sense that "with" puts stronger importance or emphasis on the second thing mentioned. For example: "I went with Mary to the concert." Mary was going to the concert, I just accompanied her. "Mary went with me to the concert." Actually, I was going, and Mary decided to come along.
"Mary and I went to the concert." Who knows whose idea it was. It might have been a joint decision. The word with does not lend this implication at all.
Comments 9
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
They both denote an accompanyment--I mean, you can easily I say, "I went with Stinky McShoebuckle to Watership Down last Saturday," or "Stinky McShoebuckle and I went to Watership Down last Saturday"--and it means the same exact thing. You would probably never say either of those things, but nonetheless.
It's just a matter of a compound-noun-thingy or an adverbial phrase.
Reply
For example:
"I went with Mary to the concert." Mary was going to the concert, I just accompanied her.
"Mary went with me to the concert." Actually, I was going, and Mary decided to come along.
"Mary and I went to the concert." Who knows whose idea it was. It might have been a joint decision. The word with does not lend this implication at all.
Reply
Leave a comment