Dissolution

[aquaticity]

Which famous photographer are you?
Joel-Peter Witkin: Known for photographing human spectacles including hermaphrodites, dwarfs, amputees, androgynes, carcasses, people with odd physical capabilities & fetishists
"When I produce a photograph that totally satisfies, a part of me actually dies. And I think that death is an aspect of myself being

Comments

[hermeneut]

You didn't rip off a quote from me. Or, wait a minute. It's Wasson isn't it? Are you saying that I'm not your favorite mycolater? I'm off-ended. But you know, ecstasy is not fun is just as true as ecstasy is fun. I would say:

ecstasy is (not) fun [and/or (not) fun].
This sentence encrypts a 10-fold statement: the perfect copulation of being and non-being, 1 and 0, sun and moon, water and body.
1. ecstasy is fun
2. ecstasy is not fun
3. ecstasy is fun and fun
4. ecstasy is fun or fun
5. ecstasy is not fun and fun
6. ecstasy is not fun or fun
7. ecstasy is fun and not fun
8. ecstasy is fun or not fun
9. ecstasy is not fun and not fun
10. ecstasy is not fun or not fun

The ambiguity is part of all ek-stasis. Out-standing, an inside is invaginated. Out and in (1 and 0; being and non-being): gooey ambiguity.

[aquaticity]

Yes, of course you're my favorite mycolater! You and Wasson shoot up from the same underground network, don't you? Along with Maria and her catchy tunes. I think her songs are the best ever, good for everyone, at every time, at every place.

And what wonderful nagarjunic logic you have there!

Are you trying to blow my mind??
Bemushroom me??
Get me stuck in gooey ambiguity??

Ecstatic invagination is so inviting and yet so repulsive. What a coincidental oppositorium. This place is so much more exciting than a leftorium could ever be!