One of the points I've now seen raised once too often in the Thirteenth Child MammothFail is that you can't call it genocide to prevent Native Americans' ancestors even arriving in the Americas in the first place. The people are still alive, just somewhere else! They haven't been killed
(
Read more... )
Comments 25
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I live in one county with a Native American name and work in a second county with a Native American name. While the names of the towns and cities I work in are European, the origins of the counties are Native. Depending upon the season, I can buy fresh-caught salmon from Native Americans. I see advertisements for local casinos operated by Native Americans. Native Americans are exercising a growing strength in political discussions in my region.
This is not equally true of many places within the US.
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's not so much that trying to imagine it makes my brain hurt, it's the fact that there are so many white people who clearly don't think it would be a big deal that it can support entire books like Thirteenth Child.
Reply
That was one of my gripes with the book. It's a pity that Patricia didn't go the whole hog and opt for a real Lost Continent -- an Atlantis that never sank or something -- because I don't feel that the ecology is convincing at all. By removing the native people, the land lost all its flavour and the incomers are Generic European, which in real life just doesn't exist. They would have come with their own cultural baggage from whatever country they'd emigrated from.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment