Leave a comment

Comments 22

billydontrat January 10 2006, 14:29:08 UTC
I wonder if the author of the article is a fan of "Evildead"?

Reply


min0taur January 10 2006, 14:48:45 UTC
I dunno. Sounds like academic folklore to me. Just plausible, though; for an era that was so squeamish about bodily matters, the 19th century -- especially the Victorians -- did some bizarre things with human remains (for example, electroplating dead infants and putting them on display in glass coffins that served as coffee tables). But (dead Pharaohs aside) human tissue isn't all that, well, durable. Apparently Jeremy Bentham had his body taxidermied and mounted after death (figuring it shouldn't go to waste, but begging the question of whether Utilitarian philosophers warrant statues); alas, it kept falling apart. Embarrassing. And then there's the matter of how to maintain the binding -- Lubriderm? (Just asking. And kidding.)

Reply


_boneflower_ January 10 2006, 18:58:23 UTC
An anatomy book bound in human skin. How ironic!

I may be morbid, but I think this is pretty cool. It reminds me of the modern-day doctor-turned-artist who plasticizes parts of cadavers (with their permission) for living sculpture.

Reply


O_o thorny_rose November 1 2006, 08:45:31 UTC
That's somethin else.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up