Hello all, I'm in desperate need of a little assistance.
I'm presently working on a rather large paper that will, ideally, be a critical review of Liza Dalby's ethnography, Geisha, published back in 1983. It's an extremely famous work, and Dalby is renowned as the "American geisha"... which is the point I wish to contest, as Dalby was never an
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
When an anthropologist claims to have "become" the thing they're studying, isn't that the same as what we call going native? :D
Of course, I haven't read Dalby's book so there might be a difference, but it certainly sounds like it... And going native is always a bit controversial topic in anthropology IMO, as in a way all successful participant observation requires some amount of "going native"...
So at least if you need some theoretical background to back up your point, you might want to take a look at some of the various texts concerning the different aspects of "going native" while doing anthropological research.
Hope that helped, even a little! :P :D
Reply
Is there any way that you might be interested in changing your topic around a bit in order to do a comparative approach and look at Dalby's experience versus Japanese geisha? There would be a lot of information and resources that you could draw from.
Reply
Reply
There is a documentary called Hannari: Geisha Modern that you may want to check out. The only problem is that most current day geisha resources are mostly in Japanese. Good luck to you!
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Hmm... I'll have a look at the documentaries my school has, see if I can find something of this sort. Thank you!
Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrDGTUm2vBc
(The full doco is on YouTube in multiple parts.)
It's not an academic source, of course, but I found it really interesting
Reply
Reply
Also, Geisha: A Life is a very good book.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment