Stop everything & read this essay by jblum on fandom's odd reactions to Moffat and his adaptation of "A Scandal in Bohemia". It offers another reading of that final scene that I found fascinating and persuasive
( Read more... )
Clearly I'm not doing something right because I really enjoyed A Scandal in Belgravia. It was the Hound of Baskerville that I disliked intensely.
Anyway, my biggest problem with "Scandal" was the fact that apparently Watson didn't notice that Holmes was gone when he (Holmes) went to rescue Irene.
The Hound was purer pastiche, if that makes any sense. The elements of the original are all there sort of mixed up & modernized. The original is kind of a sucky mystery but a good horror story. Gatiss's adaptation is all about the horror aspects. I appreciate it better after my re-read yesterday.
"Scandal" was more *fun*, though. Not a horror story.
I haven't watched Sherlock yet, but I really enjoyed the jblum's essay in general: it was, as you pointed out, spot on about fandom going for the black & white interpretations that undoes the presentation of complex characters. Oh, how that plays out over and over and over again.
Oh, great essay. I liked the episode, saw her as an excellent, strong character, liked her as Sherlock's match, and now I like her even more, with jblum's comparison to the literary character
( ... )
Comments 6
Anyway, my biggest problem with "Scandal" was the fact that apparently Watson didn't notice that Holmes was gone when he (Holmes) went to rescue Irene.
Reply
Reply
"Scandal" was more *fun*, though. Not a horror story.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment