I think this would make Paul McGann Richard II.

Jan 27, 2008 15:52

So lareinenoire and I were talking about Shakespeare crossovers, and this happened:

angevin2: anyway, all the plays set on the continent more or less in shakespeare's day cross over quite easily
lareinenoire: Yes indeed.
angevin2: all plays in britain are more or less doing their own thing ;)
lareinenoire: They are, rather.
angevin2: merry wives is sort of a special case since it is a spinoff
lareinenoire: It is. It ( Read more... )

crackpot theories, doctor who

Leave a comment

Comments 9

(The comment has been removed)

angevin2 January 27 2008, 22:01:59 UTC
Which is AWESOME.

Reply


kezya January 27 2008, 22:15:02 UTC
...now i'm picturing christopher eccleston as bolingbroke. heh.

...!!!

That would make me so, so happy. :)

Reply


inoldentimes January 27 2008, 22:49:42 UTC
HA! Awesomeness in text form!
:D

Reply


gillo January 27 2008, 22:57:29 UTC

I still maintain that Jack is Edward IV

Which would make Captain John Richard of Gloucester?

...now i'm picturing christopher eccleston as bolingbroke.

Now there's a nice thought. David Tennant as Hamlet will just have to be enough for me to be going on with, though...

Reply

lareinenoire January 27 2008, 23:16:09 UTC
Which would make Captain John Richard of Gloucester?

OMG I think my brain just exploded in the Best. Way. Possible.

Which reminds me, I really should get up off my arse and buy tickets for Tennant as Hamlet...

Reply

gillo January 28 2008, 00:22:48 UTC

OMG I think my brain just exploded in the Best. Way. Possible.

There really isn't a downside to that concept is there? I'd love to see JM do a role like that.

I have tickets sorted already for September. [/smug]

Reply


executrix January 27 2008, 23:38:25 UTC
does that make falstaff jack harkness?
I know thee not, old man--fall to thy jar!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up