a Bold New Theory!

[angevin2]

So in a locked post about the authorship controversy, I got into a conversation with matociquala about name punning as proof of authorship in Shakespeare's plays. I pointed out, when she commented on Shakespeare's punning on his own name as evidence against anyone else's authorship -- a very, very good point in Shakespeare's favor -- that a favorite Oxfordian

Comments

[ladyshrew]

LOL So, so wrong. I want a signed copy of your book. ;-)

[aussiepeach]

You forgot a biggie: men were deceivers E. Ver.

Conspiracy!!

[erstwhiletexan]

This is possibly the coolest thing I have read in a while. I also want a signed copy of your book! When will it be out? :D

[melissa_mifeng]

Brilliant! they do say Publish or Perish, no?

(also, stands in line for auto'd copy)

[angevin2]

HEH
WELL, THEY CAN BITE ME
THE WHOLE IDEA IS THAT _SHAKESPEARE_ PUT THE REFERENCES IN
TO SAY RUDE AND SOMETIMES DIRTY THINGS ABOUT OXFORD

ALSO I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT AUMERLE'S LINE ABOUT HIS KNEES GROWING TO THE EARTH WAS FILTHY