Leave a comment

Comments 4

woodpijn February 22 2021, 13:40:01 UTC
What point are you and/or the article writer making about the Hogwarts Legacy guy? It's sounding like they (and, by implication, you) want him to be deprived of his livelihood because of political opinions he expressed in the past and off the clock, but I hope I've misunderstood.

Reply

andrewducker February 22 2021, 13:48:39 UTC
Yup. If you're involved in hate-filled abuse campaigns then I don't want to buy things from you. Even if you do so in your own time.

Reply

woodpijn February 22 2021, 22:37:11 UTC
Not being deliberately obtuse, but I can't work out whether that's "Yup, I do think he should lose his livelihood" or "Yup, you have misunderstood: I'm happy for Warner to employ him, but I just don't personally want to buy the product."
The article seemed outraged that Warner continued to employ him after he disclosed the YouTube channel to them.

I don't know any more about him than the article says, but it doesn't look like he is (or was) involved in "abuse campaigns". It doesn't say he abused or harassed any individuals. Putting personal opinions on a YouTube channel, which people who find those opinions offensive don't have to watch, is very different from proactively contacting or targeting individuals with abuse or harassment.

Reply

andrewducker February 22 2021, 22:52:23 UTC
I wouldn't be buying it anyway (No more money for Potter from me). But if I was, I wouldn't be buying it on these grounds. I'm not stopping other people buying it though.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up