Straight up Roland Barthes stuff - we build our own narrative and for us it has the meaning we assign it, though our narrative may have a different meaning for others. And other people do the same and we are free to interpret their narratives as we see fit and all that really matters to any of us are our own interpretations.
On the subject of maximum wages or maximum incomes I think another difficulty is around extra-terratoriality and unearned income and perhaps enforcement more generally
( ... )
Yup. International cooperation is definitely the way to go to tackle this stuff. And I agree that the rich will simply find ways around caps, particularly if they're working for international companies.
Equivocating feels less bad than lying but will cost yocartesiandaemonJanuary 11 2017, 13:48:18 UTC
It's funny, I do *feel* that, and I love the idea of twisting literally worded statements (in fantasy bargaining etc). But as long as I remember, I remember thinking "if you're going to lie, you might well just lie properly". It's just as morally culpable and not usually less deniable. (I rarely ever did, I was way too honest)
Bosses' bizarre excuses for failing to pay minimum wagecartesiandaemonJanuary 11 2017, 13:49:33 UTC
I was going to say, do they do this for other laws? Oh, but I had a good reason for breaking the law, so that must make it ok, right? But obviously, yes, they actually DO do that. Right up to, "but it wasn't murder, he had it coming!"
they're rubbish at noticing how many legs they havecartesiandaemonJanuary 11 2017, 13:53:16 UTC
I did wonder, if anyone said, "they're all human", the experimenter would have said, "yes, well done, good guess" and stopped, or gone on till they guessed "white".
I'm a bit torn, because it really really is a very big problem that people treat what's common as an unmarked default, and it does cause problems in all sorts of ways. But if some people genuinely ARE in a majority, it IS much less notable if you see three of them at once.
It's more blatant when a privileged group is thought of as unmarked default when they're NOT in a majority.
RE: Re: they're rubbish at noticing how many legs they havecartesiandaemonJanuary 11 2017, 14:56:20 UTC
Indeed.
Although I remember from similar experiments (eg. assuming the race of a doctor when you're only told they're a doctor, etc), people who are not white usually having the same assumptions as white people, but not quite as strong, so while I can't know, I would guess something similar would happen here.
Comments 19
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I'm a bit torn, because it really really is a very big problem that people treat what's common as an unmarked default, and it does cause problems in all sorts of ways. But if some people genuinely ARE in a majority, it IS much less notable if you see three of them at once.
It's more blatant when a privileged group is thought of as unmarked default when they're NOT in a majority.
Reply
Reply
Although I remember from similar experiments (eg. assuming the race of a doctor when you're only told they're a doctor, etc), people who are not white usually having the same assumptions as white people, but not quite as strong, so while I can't know, I would guess something similar would happen here.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment