That's an attractive idea (though why the focus is on England rather than England-and-Wales I'm not sure), but it puts the cart before the horse. In the absence of any England-wide assembly or parliament, it's hard to see how England could decide to leave the UK. What body would confirm such a decision?
There's already such a thing as English Votes for English Laws, and Parliament could easily decide to make up a constitutional precedent on the hoof - it does that sort of thing all the time.
I think the main obstacle for this sort of thing is that England (or England-and-Wales, whatever) would very much like to carry on being the successor state for trivial things like the permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
Of course you're entirely correct as to the latter point: even though the nuclear weapons that guarantee that seat would be based in the UK, on the Clyde.
No doubt a secession referendum could be passed by the UK parliament - it is sovereign, after all - but it would be a non-starter unless there were some democratic England-wide body (with a concomitant civil service, etc.) ready to take power in the event of a Yes vote. And of course there has been no such body since 1707. That's why I say the article puts the cart before the horse. First get your national parliament, then bid for independence. Just like the Scots, in fact.
In practice England would just keep Westminster and the UK civil service. It would be silly otherwise: what would the remaining UK do with a Parliament and a civil service based in a foreign country?
I'm sure that banning unpaid internships will mean that the kind of industries where it's expected will suddenly all have a lot of "volunteers" and will expect you to have done "volunteer work" there before getting into that industry.
Comments 11
Reply
I think the main obstacle for this sort of thing is that England (or England-and-Wales, whatever) would very much like to carry on being the successor state for trivial things like the permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
Reply
No doubt a secession referendum could be passed by the UK parliament - it is sovereign, after all - but it would be a non-starter unless there were some democratic England-wide body (with a concomitant civil service, etc.) ready to take power in the event of a Yes vote. And of course there has been no such body since 1707. That's why I say the article puts the cart before the horse. First get your national parliament, then bid for independence. Just like the Scots, in fact.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment