Aug 05, 2016 12:00
prison,
art,
microsoft,
computers,
work,
fraud,
death,
scotland,
fandom,
movies,
northernireland,
inequality,
russia,
games,
babies,
sad,
comic,
success,
windows,
ukraine,
ocean,
animals,
links,
vianwhyte,
healthcare,
history,
norway,
government,
technology,
immune_system,
uk,
voting,
wheat,
data,
comics,
communication,
quality,
video,
physics,
dc,
intelligence,
childbirth,
denmark,
logic,
ireland,
behavior,
computing,
food,
tax,
viaswampers,
politics,
mathematics
Comments 13
Reply
What I'd want would be for the representatives to vote _in proportion_ to the people they are proxying.
Reply
And that might get you in to an interesting arms race situation as all sides in the particular debate try and win the internal vote by one in order to gain all the representatives votes.
Reply
And turns every vote into a referendum. Whereas actually I want my representatives to be negotiating with each other, and trying to find areas of compromise, which I'm not sure this would achieve.
Reply
I guess that's why I liked the Citadel DLC for ME3 so much, because if you play it after the trilogy is complete, it works really, really well as a coda to the story of your Shepard.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The resulting graphs were... pretty, I guess? Putting together lots of trivial observations to end up with something nearly-trivial-but-not-quite. And pretty. But it seems a somewhat strange way to visualise what's an exceedingly simple function.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment