Dec 07, 2015 12:00
flu,
slavery,
smiles,
india,
wwi,
prejudice,
genetics,
women,
law,
snow,
diy,
makeup,
thefuture,
plot,
short_story,
viaandrewhickey,
advice,
disease,
babies,
archeology,
sex,
breasts,
abuse,
animals,
links,
history,
science,
uk,
starwars,
comedy,
video,
physics,
design,
porn,
censorship,
photography,
tv,
stonehenge,
prehistory,
viajamesnicoll,
writing,
photos,
religion,
evolution,
viaswampers,
war,
gregegan,
elephants,
scifi,
clothing,
alcohol
Comments 14
And given we don't actually know exactly when the stones were quarried, nor exactly when they were erected, it's a bit of a stretch to say there is a gap of 500 years during which time they were part of a monument in Wales. There's... too much wiggle room in these numbers. The +/- error on dates around 3400-2900BC give plenty space for overlap.
Reply
Reply
So if the date of the quarry is +200 and the stones being erected at Stonehenge is -200, then that just leaves a gap of 100 years, which is not an unreasonable length of time for purchase/transport/completion. The whole Stonehenge monument complex is one that was worked on for many hundreds of years, so the people who lived there were clearly very committed to the projects that their long distant ancestors began.
(Things like quarries are also notoriously difficult to date reliably. I'd want to see the excavation report to understand exactly how the date was determined.)
Reply
I wonder how the left hand side of the snowflake knows to grow in the same shape as the right hand side.
Reply
Hopefully an icologist will be along shortly to educate us :-)
Reply
It was some of those complex structures that form out on the edges of the flakes that had my mind boggling, I get the innermost sections being symmetrical, but to retain that symmetry way out on the edges of these complex flake structures just... well, it seems like magic to me. :)
Reply
The thing that keeps them similar (and the best ones perfectly symmetrical) is that the shape they grow depends on the precise conditions ... and a single snowflake is very small, and each of its limbs experiences more or less the same conditions since the whole thing moves together.
Reply
I did not think "Oracle" was a very good story, from my point of view as a C.S. Lewis reader. Lewis uses not his own arguments, but ones he borrows (most implausibly, if you know Lewis's thoughts and habits) from an unnamed character whom I'm told is supposed to be Roger Penrose.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment