Leave a comment

Comments 41

gonzo21 May 15 2015, 11:13:16 UTC
Hmm, Firefox just pinged up a 'threat detected' warning on the Channel 4 blog website, and refused to open it.

Reply

andrewducker May 15 2015, 11:58:03 UTC
I'm sorry citizen, Channel 4 content has been deemed to be unacceptable for people of your security clearance.

Reply

gonzo21 May 15 2015, 12:35:50 UTC
But Citizen Computer, how else am I supposed to read their filthy commie propaganda?

Reply


bart_calendar May 15 2015, 11:15:15 UTC
In the mortuary story I bet the guy buying the pituitary glands wasn't really giving them to a hospital. In the 60s there were people using that glad to make a weird sort of haluncenigenic speed. (I forget the name of it.)

Reply

andrewducker May 15 2015, 11:57:24 UTC
I would not be even slightly surprised!

Reply

bart_calendar May 15 2015, 12:01:28 UTC
Adrenal glands were used too.

People did weird s hit back then.

Reply

cmcmck May 15 2015, 12:11:58 UTC
S'pose it makes a change from monkey glands! :o)

Reply


eatsoylentgreen May 15 2015, 11:54:44 UTC
what if it's Cameron who is undermining democracy or the British values of tolerance

Reply

andrewducker May 15 2015, 11:56:40 UTC
Then off with his head!

Reply

bart_calendar May 15 2015, 12:01:44 UTC
Can the Queen still order that?

Reply

andrewducker May 15 2015, 12:02:48 UTC
The Queen can't order anything.

She can politely suggest things, but tends to only do so in private, for stability reasons.

Reply


cmcmck May 15 2015, 12:08:28 UTC
Documents and name changes?

Oh yes! Know that one! :o/

Reply


naath May 15 2015, 12:13:30 UTC
The flip side to that article about wedding photography is that if you *don't* place any value of what a pro photographer brings over your Uncle Bob then let Bob do it and buy him a beer. Personally I probably couldn't even tell the difference, because I'm uneducated in the ways of art and a cultural no-hope I guess, but still, I'm not paying anyone thousands of pounds to do a job when I don't care about how well it is done.

Reply

andrewducker May 15 2015, 12:22:38 UTC
Oh yes, if you really can't tell good framing, lighting, etc. then there's no point paying for it.

Reply

ajr May 16 2015, 21:32:51 UTC
If you do buy Uncle Bob a beer in return for him taking your wedding photos, do be prepared for the fact they may be utterly shit, and if that's the case you should rue your own decision rather than taking it out on poor Uncle Bob.

Honestly, if you really don't care about how it's done, instead of singling out Uncle Bob, just tell all your guests to send you their cameraphone snaps after the wedding.

Reply

naath May 16 2015, 22:01:28 UTC
I think if you want "wedding photographs" you have to get *someone* to organise and take the big "group shots" that are usual. I'd probably ask several someone's to do it, and for everyone to send along all their snaps.

But realistically I *hate* commemorative photographs, so probably if I was getting married (one of) the other party/ies to the marriage would organise photography, because a)I can't tell the difference between "basically OK" and "brilliant" and b)I usually hate photographs of *me* anyway.

But "the dress"? I'd spend thousands on the right cloth for that special once-in-a-life-time excuse to spend thousands on a dress. ;-p

Reply


Leave a comment

Up