Leave a comment

Comments 21

andrewducker April 30 2015, 11:19:12 UTC
I would _really_ like to see the micropayments approach in the first link take off. I don't mind paying small amounts for articles, but no single publication is going to publish everything I want, and I'm not subscribing to 30-odd different sites!

Reply

alextfish April 30 2015, 11:43:54 UTC
Definitely. I've not paid for news for, mm, a decade or two if ever. But I'd pay a £30 annual subscription to get decent journalism from a good range of publications with different house biases and styles.

Reply

cartesiandaemon April 30 2015, 12:03:15 UTC
Yeah, it sounds really good. I almost want to read a sceptical article just to be sure I'm not imagining it.

I was especially impressed with the "refund" idea -- that takes a lot of trust that people won't just always push it automatically. But if it works, it gets payment for not just journalism, but specifically interesting journalism.

Reply


bart_calendar April 30 2015, 11:31:07 UTC
It really baffles me that the French politicians keep doing stuff like this and are able to say with a straight face that they are promoting secularism and not racism.

Reply

andrewducker April 30 2015, 13:09:45 UTC
Yup.

I'm not even in favour of banning schoolkids from religious items - but stuff like this is just taking the piss.

Reply

supergee April 30 2015, 13:41:46 UTC
Some people have just found new photographic evidence that Obama is a Muslim.

Reply


andrewducker April 30 2015, 13:10:27 UTC
That's fantastic!

Reply


cartesiandaemon April 30 2015, 12:04:56 UTC
Secularism, YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!

Reply


List of scandals with "-gate" suffix cartesiandaemon April 30 2015, 12:06:43 UTC
I love wikipedia lists. Although I wish there was a list of scandals with a funny -gate suffix :)

Reply

simont April 30 2015, 12:48:50 UTC
I was quite amused by their comment on Plebgate, 'This "-gate" scandal is noteworthy for actually involving a gate.'

(However, I respectfully disagree with Wikipedia that it was known even secondarily as 'Gategate'.)

Reply

cartesiandaemon April 30 2015, 12:50:46 UTC
This "-gate" scandal is noteworthy for actually involving a gate.'

LOL! I love those dry comments.

I respectfully disagree with Wikipedia that it was known even secondarily as 'Gategate'

I doubt that was widespread, but I'm sure people try to tag "gategate" on any crisis it could possibly be appropriate for...

Reply

steepholm April 30 2015, 15:07:16 UTC
I definitely heard "Gategate" at least once, though no doubt it was waggishly meant.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up