Leave a comment

Comments 16

artkouros January 31 2015, 14:48:07 UTC
Chili has whatever we damn well want it to have. This is Texas.

Reply

Agreed! lilchiva January 31 2015, 18:38:12 UTC
Right. I am from Texas too. And, Chili can have beans. My favorite is with beans + chocolate. Brick chili doesn't have beans because beans are already good for storage. And, also, "chili con carne" comes from Spain. But, "chili" is of course Texan.

(I am going to have to stop reading Andrew's links when I am tired. I am doing that whole "wrong on the internet" thing with them.)

Reply

Re: Agreed! andrewducker February 1 2015, 20:09:20 UTC
I should note that there are a fair portion of links that are posted so that other people can tell me whether they're right, or just sound that way to me :->

Reply


kalimac January 31 2015, 16:49:58 UTC
Chili with beans is so common that, in my childhood, I thought the longer term "chili con carne" meant "chili with beans." (Obviously I didn't know any Spanish.)

Whether it should or should not have any, I don't know; this is not my ethnicity. I can say, however, that I am continuously irked by the sale of things that are called bagels but are not bagels; they're bread in the shape of a doughnut. I don't mind the existence of these things; what I mind is that they're falsely called bagels and falsely touted for their authenticity.

Reply

naath January 31 2015, 18:30:05 UTC
Chilli con carne being "Chilli with meat" lead me to believe that the *meat is optional* like you can have "chilli" or you can have it "with meat".

In any case I don't believe it is possible to control words like that. I'm sure many an Indian would be HORRIFIED at what we call curry over here (especially the yellow kind, with raisins in...) and many an Italian would be pretty sure we really don't understand pizza. and yet, here we are, eating curry and pizza and chilli and all sorts of Anglicised versions of other people's food. Besides, I'm sure the average Texan would go ballistic if EU-style Protected Designation of Origin rules were introduced there...

Reply

kalimac January 31 2015, 18:38:22 UTC
"many an Indian would be horrified ... many an Italian would be pretty sure"

And they should. I won't speak to curry, which I know little of, but I have had pizza in Italy as well as all over the US and even in the UK, and I'm grateful for the modifiers like "Chicago-style pizza" that let you know what you're getting is not pizza as anybody else understands it, but a separate kind of dish inspired by and derived from pizza.

I'd appreciate it if such modifiers were more widely-spread. It would enable me more easily to avoid versions I don't like, such as "toppings on a cracker fast-food-chain American pizza" or "vilely soggy undercooked English pizza."

Reply

andrewducker January 31 2015, 22:40:57 UTC
You have not lived until you have tasted Scottish deep-friend pizza.

Reply


pennski January 31 2015, 18:10:49 UTC
And I commit the heinous crime of calling it chilli and serving it with rice.

Reply

lilchiva January 31 2015, 18:39:35 UTC
You are a God among men.

Reply

pennski February 1 2015, 15:49:27 UTC
Thank-you!

Or possibly a Goddess among women? :)

Reply


dueling Platonic ideals of chili apostle_of_eris January 31 2015, 21:17:49 UTC
In food categories, I totally will not say "the best". Why spend hours arguing when everyone will come out with the same ideas they went in with?
But in special super categories like pizza or chili or BBQ, I refuse to say "the best style".

Reply


don_fitch January 31 2015, 22:13:40 UTC
This chili discussion promises to be entertaining, but I fear it won't do much to clarify the thinking of many people ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up