Jan 10, 2015 11:00
sexwork,
computers,
oxytocin,
education,
potato,
phd,
google,
glasgow,
scotland,
life,
usa,
lasvegas,
academia,
russia,
hormones,
games,
socialmedia,
edinburgh,
children,
links,
friends,
driving,
ohforfuckssake,
technology,
science,
sexism,
uk,
evidence,
birthday,
vegetarian,
video,
restaurant,
calendars,
career,
race,
brains,
tv,
parenting,
gender,
lgbt,
politics,
debate
Leave a comment
Comments 18
Reply
It seems to come from "people with mental illnesses shouldn't be driving" + "gender dysphoria is a mental illness".
And is just plain ridiculous and awful.
Reply
If you read the actual piece of legislation here you will see on page 2 the list of conditions which are proscribed for driving.
Yeah, it's in Russian, but see those F01, F09 etc codes? Those refer to this WHO document ( ... )
Reply
To be fair to the BBC the report doesn't say anything about gay people not being able to drive, though it does link the ban on trans people with the wider measures against homosexuality in Russia. Looking at the documents you mention, however (thanks for the links), you're right that the net does seem to be cast much more widely. The real intent behind the measures will probably only become apparent when we see who actually gets denied a licence: if trans people are denied but arachnaphobes or depressives are not, that'll be a clue.
There's already a pretty big clue that this has little to do with driving in that one group not covered are those with an addiction to alcohol or psychoactive substances.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I have a rant brewing about how rubbish Hangouts is as an SMS app - part of which is it insisting the G+ contacts are more real than ones that have only phone numbers. Which means it suggests people I barely know (see above) in long lists ahead of people I text daily.
I am very close to deleting most of my G+ contacts to deal with this.
Reply
Oh, and it turns out that I can turn off the "Birthday" calendar from the calendar list on the left! Which I'm sure I couldn't last time I checked, so might be a reaction by Google to the criticism.
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment