Nov 25, 2014 11:00
art,
music,
behaviour,
programming,
twitter,
gatesfoundation,
nasa,
class,
heart,
terrorism,
pay,
usa,
openaccess,
income,
lotr,
postoffices,
nhs,
academia,
publishing,
research,
children,
links,
fees,
uk,
funny,
apps,
tuition,
delivery,
labour,
porn,
censorship,
t-shirts,
space,
viaalextfish,
gender,
poverty,
amazon,
bed,
politics,
libdem
Leave a comment
Comments 31
Reply
Reply
Reply
The writer doesn't appear to understand that increments are not "rises", but a way for employers to put off paying the full rate for the job for several years.
I'm not a nurse, but the same system applies in HE. For example, in 2013, after being a senior lecturer for 19 years, I finally got promoted to Associate Professor. Naturally, I'd been bumping along the top of my senior lecturer pay scale for many years by then. The pay for an Associate Professor is about £5,000pa more than the pay for an SL. Does that mean I got a £5,000 pay rise? Not at all. I got a £1,000 pay rise. The next year I got another £1,1000. By 2017 I will (unless the Government changes the rules in HE too) be paid the rate for an AP.
So, does the fact that I'm denied the full increase for five years mean I should be cut out of nationally negotiated pay deals (or, in the case of the nurses, recommendations by the pay review body?)?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've read the Chomsky-Zinn parody before. It's still funny.
Reply
I can't help but feel that there's something I'm missing.
Reply
Leave a comment