Sep 25, 2014 12:00
india,
literature,
independence,
dailymail,
light,
web,
death,
patriarchy,
scotland,
viasupergee,
summer,
economics,
usa,
fiction,
mars,
optimization,
family,
environment,
masturbation,
academia,
games,
sex,
symbols,
welfare,
links,
terrypratchett,
men,
technology,
firefly,
uk,
media,
nanotech,
anger,
funny,
apple,
physics,
led,
solarpower,
neilgaiman,
tv,
gameofthrones,
space,
iphone,
writing,
psychology,
china,
violence,
lgbt,
oil,
politics,
cats,
tonyblair
Comments 25
Reply
Reply
Wow, that's a pretty amazing result. I hoped to see more responses telling me how certain to be of it. It's certainly plausible to me as the sort of thing that could be true: IIRC we don't have any definitive evidence that black holes DO exist, and that sort of deduction that they can never assemble the mass to form is the sort of calculation that people have done before, like Hawking. And if it turns out that black holes are a strange quirk of GR without QM, that would be very satisfactory, there are lots of things that SOUND like they could happen, but turn out not to work like that in real physics, because the model that predicted them is correct, but the reasons why that can't happen aren't obvious in it.
On the other hand, even if the maths is correct, there are lots of things published (or put on ArXiv) that turn out not to be as revolutionary as they sound once someone other than the author gives an opinion on them.
Reply
I'm looking forward to the "Oh yes they do!"in a few months.
Reply
Reply
Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
Reply
Leave a comment