Jun 30, 2014 12:00
viafanf,
microsoft,
viaskreidle,
behaviour,
google,
language,
watches,
errors,
conservatives,
usa,
games,
babies,
formats,
emotion,
water,
links,
drugs,
uk,
height,
facebook,
crime,
video,
reporting,
morals,
android,
visualisation,
googleglass,
legalisation,
opensource,
grammar,
ireland,
manipulation,
poverty,
psychology,
tax,
mexico,
fun
Leave a comment
Comments 25
Reply
Because you end up with a situation where the parties end up defining themselves in opposition to each other, and complete deadlock, whereas if the areas were left to their own devices they might be able to move forward without it being a point of principal that they don't.
But I understand that the idea of the USA being broken up is inconcievable :->
Reply
Reply
I'm seriously unconvinced. I don't care about getting texts or email w/o looking at my phone. What google glass can do that I want is AR navigation (which sadly seems to be the only sort of augmented reality it does), and easy and non-annoying access to a camera, neither of which a smartwatch can do. Of course, this generation of glass is also sufficiently limited (and expensive) that I'll wait for the 2nd (or more likely the 3rd) generation device.
Reply
Give it two more versions to make it much awesomer and I think it will have value, but right now I'm not convinced.
Reply
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-25/google-glass-faces-driving-bans-as-states-move-to-bar-use.html
Reply
The "War on Drugs" is really more a "War on Losing Our Jobs".
Reply
Leave a comment