Leave a comment

Comments 13

bohemiancoast April 28 2014, 11:28:14 UTC
On the one hand, that bike lock is adorable. On the other hand, it has a tiny key that you have to remove from your key ring, after having a drink, while wearing bike gloves, in the driving wind and rain, and dark, without dropping it down the drain. It had better come with spares (bear in mind that bike locks often come with up to 5 spares anyway because of the general problem).

Reply

andrewducker April 28 2014, 11:44:28 UTC
Yeah, it's a neat piece of design, but the second I realised you couldn't keep it on a key chain it seemed like a non-starter.

I can't think of a way around that at the moment...

Reply

resonant April 29 2014, 01:31:46 UTC
It would actually be easier to manufacture if it accepted a flat standard key with a hole. Slide the key into a slot perpendicular to the axis, rotate, then rotate on a second axis. No need for a fancy hook. You'd still need to unclip it from your keychain to make it perfectly unpickable, but there are lanyards that allow that to be done easily.

Reply

naath April 28 2014, 12:16:16 UTC
Plus, it involves masses of extra faff that you have to do - to the end of a D-lock ,that is probably tangled up with someone else's bike, likely at either knee level or above head-height (we have some double-decker bike racks in Cambridge), whilst reaching around multiple other bikes (that are liable to attempt to fall over on you).

D-locks are IME a tremendous pain to use even in ideal conditions, and conditions are rarely ideal. And this one looks to make the pain much larger.

Plus thieves don't have to "pick the lock" they will "just" saw through it (it's tough, but do-able).

Reply


gonzo21 April 28 2014, 11:59:26 UTC
It's things like that Dark Market that will result in bitcoin being declared illegal sooner or later.

Reply

andrewducker April 28 2014, 12:14:28 UTC
Naah. No more than The Pirate Bay led to BitTorrent being made illegal.

Reply

octopoid_horror April 28 2014, 17:26:48 UTC
Actually, using bitcoins is already considered suspicious activity by some banks.

Or, more accurately, the dubiousness of various of the exchanges means that using btcis a good way to flag up as suspicious activity on your account if you are buying or sell BTC for currency. If you don't do this then of course, no one will ever know!

Given that, as far as I'm aware, the two main actual uses of bitcoins* are buying drugs and gambling (the latter of which is illegal if it's US cross-border gambling which I assume it's likely to be given the bitcoin usage stats I've seen online), no wonder banks look at transactions to/from exchanges with some suspicion.

*I'm aware there are other things you can use bitcoins for, but I think I remember something saying that about half the blockchain was gambling transactions, and as far as I know, many of the sites that purportedly take bitcoin see very few transactions.

Reply

nancylebov April 28 2014, 12:23:30 UTC
Would just having DarkMarket software on your computer be enough to put you under suspicion?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up