Apr 14, 2013 12:00
weather,
school,
india,
work,
viateresafloyd,
uk,
transparentsociety,
funny,
facebook,
dancing,
video,
android,
wealth,
drwho,
inequality,
googleglass,
usa,
mars,
gameofthrones,
space,
religion,
privacy,
children,
welfare,
links,
animals
Leave a comment
Comments 53
Reply
Reply
Reply
Which would be fine, if it basically added shortcuts/info from Facebook. But instead it does that _and_ makes it harder to get to your actual apps.
Reply
I particularly liked the conversation that I am summarising as
“But how will people pay for things to be sent to Mars if Mars can’t send anything back?2
“Woowie, It’s MARS man. MARS!”
“But there won’t be any exports from Mars. “
“Mars, Mars, Mars!”
“Balance of Trade? Anyone? Bueller?”
“Elon is taking us to Mars to work as sex slaves for eternity.”
Reply
And yes, this would be a one-way trip to start with. With no real reason to go there, other than really wanting to. After all, so far as I understand, there's nothing we can get on Mars that we can't get here.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's not a product. It's an early conceptual prototype.
Wearable cameras the size of map tacks will be here in a week or two, and cheap as dirt a month or two later. With billions of people online, there will be myriad applications we here wouldn't dream of. With augmented reality apps in the cloud, people with excellent vision may start wearing glasses just to get all the environmental extras. You'll be able to aggregate innumerable shots of anything publicly visible into detailed 3D models, and take it from there. Likely in real time.
about the internet: It's earlier than you think.
Reply
Leave a comment