Leave a comment

Comments 39

poisonduk September 27 2011, 19:19:30 UTC
Solar panels are so ugly!

Reply

andrewducker September 27 2011, 19:28:38 UTC
Better than massive powerplants or rising sea levels though.

Reply

poisonduk September 27 2011, 20:27:02 UTC
Interesting to see how it affects planning permission - considering Edinburghs rulings re Satellite dishes etc I'd be curious how they can freely allow solar panels - if it has to go through planning regulations neighbours will object. I know I would.

Reply

momentsmusicaux September 27 2011, 20:28:09 UTC
You wouldn't be able to see them that much. They'd be in line with the roof. And you know, what Andy said. And get over it ;)

Reply


momentsmusicaux September 27 2011, 20:27:06 UTC
Everyone seems to be running around like chickens repeating this "This even happens if you log out of Facebook" like it's "Soylent Green is people" or something. Like it's such a dramatic and shocking revelation.

Even I got taken in briefly. And then I thought about it.

Suppose I go to site kittens.com. And kittens wants to tell Facebook that I went there and looked at kittens. Is kittens.com going to use my browser to pretend to be me logged into Facebook? I mean, that's doable with javascript or even an iframe or image or that sort of thing. But that's kinda crappy. What it's going to do instead is tell Facebook via an API. As in, magic communication between computers. Which means it's going to lift some cookie data to figure out who I am on Facebook, and then communicate directly with FB and say, 'Hey, user 12345 was here!'.

Hence, even if I log out of Facebook, it'll still do that.

Reply


momentsmusicaux September 27 2011, 20:28:46 UTC
Wonder how tenement blocks should go about trying to get solar panels. Might the council set up some kind of guidelines on how to get things in motion for one's block?

Reply

danieldwilliam September 28 2011, 09:00:47 UTC
Transition Edinburgh South might have some good advice on how to do common projects like solar panels in tenement blocks.

Reply

momentsmusicaux September 28 2011, 16:00:32 UTC
Huh. That was very timely!

This is tomorrow:

TES Energy Action Talk @ the Eric Liddell Centre, Morningside Road
Thursday 29th September, 8.15pm

http://www.transitionedinburghsouth.org.uk/calendar/tes-energy-action-launch-eric-liddell-centre

Reply

andrewducker September 28 2011, 16:07:49 UTC
That is very handy.

Do let us know what comes out of it!

Reply


octopoid_horror September 27 2011, 20:39:44 UTC
Boycotting an author (or publisher) who is still alive and making money/getting publicity is somewhat different to boycotting an author who has been dead for centuries.

Reply

brixtonbrood September 28 2011, 06:35:15 UTC

This. I am a Wagnerian, but I wouldn't be paying money to see his operas or buy them on CD if he were still alive and raking in the cash from my purchase, because he was vile - I will also not be buying Gary Glitter's Greatest Hits any time soon.

There are some authors which I am pleased to spend money on; if I hear of a new book of theirs I will be on Amazon in seconds. Certain other authors I will tend to avoid; if I do want to read a book of theirs I'll borrow from the library if they're American, or look for a second hand copy. And I don't give money to Rupert Murdoch where I can reasonably avoid it.

But I wouldn't boycott because someone has a different stance on copyright law to me, that's just childish.

Reply

thakil September 28 2011, 09:13:28 UTC
Yes, exactly. I found that article amusing precisely because all those artists are dead. Art is not devalued by the source of its creation, but giving money to an artist who is vile is deeply unpleasent to me.

Reply


philmophlegm September 27 2011, 22:48:55 UTC
"Changing race by changing clothes? Stereotypes and status symbols impact if a face is viewed as black or white."

This is news only to people who've never seen Ali G.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up