A student walked into my class 10 minutes late yesterday. He proceeded to walk up to one of the girls, talk to her a moment, and walked back out of the room. (infraction 1 - leaving the room without permission). He then walked back in a minute later and hands her a bag of chips from the vending machine (infraction 2 - students are not supposed to
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
I'm not sure if I'm more fascinated by someone doing that or by the suggestion that there's an explicit rule against it.
Rule 35,771: No burning of sacrificial goats during final exams. :-)
(In a similar vein, Toronto's public transit has signs pointing out that attacking their drivers is forbidden. I somehow thought that should have been obvious.)
Reply
It reminds me of the way rules and regulations develop in the military. A lot of the time, the presence of the rule means that someone tried it. Example: When I lived in the barracks, we were explicitly told not to tape ponchos to our arms and legs and jump off the barracks roof in the middle of a hurricane. The reason we had this rule? Someone did it and broke both their legs...
Reply
The problem with explicit is that you're likely to find someone saying, "But *I* didn't use ponchos...."
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Your students. Your patience. I have no words.
Reply
one case of I missed all 3 of the review days this week, but showed up for the test and it's your fault, Mr. Teacher, that I don't know how to do this stuff.... Did we even learn this in class? This is new stuff, isn't it? You're giving us a test on something you never taught? How could you? I'm gonna sit here and sulk and throw my paper on the floor. Don't you see me pouting at you?
Reply
Leave a comment