Don't worry, I felt the same way. I was like 'you are such a pretentious bitch.' I really think she was added for that scene to fulfill a contract obligation or something. She absolutely added no content to the scene except to show that she has put the evil man in his place by telling him what to do and then he puts her on a pedestal and praises her for doing the right thing when he would be an evil and heartless bastard without her
( ... )
She's kind of childish in that way, isn't she? Like she doesn't understand that sometimes the world has gray areas. It isn't just black and white; pharmacompany man evil, and therefore it's wrong to take money from him.
So Charlie, who is torn between that decision, who is stuck in the gray (like a NORMAL human being) appears to her like an immoral person.
Personally, I had to laugh when she started in on "exploitation of the Third World". This, from a girl who admitted she knew nothing of her heritage until "Harvest"?
She's just there as a placeholder - someone to mouth words the producers don't want to hire an extra actor for.
The sofa needs a lesson in politics and reality. I'm sure she checks the medicines and stuff she purchases - including all those designer clothes that constantly reveal her cleavage - and makes sure they all come from companies that don't exploit the third world. I'm sure that everything she has is from companies that are honest and use honest and legitmate work.
Or maybe it doesn't matter if she does it - only if her pussy whipped boyfriend does research for them.
Comments 8
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
So Charlie, who is torn between that decision, who is stuck in the gray (like a NORMAL human being) appears to her like an immoral person.
Reply
She's just there as a placeholder - someone to mouth words the producers don't want to hire an extra actor for.
Reply
Or maybe it doesn't matter if she does it - only if her pussy whipped boyfriend does research for them.
Reply
Leave a comment