Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters mini nonspoilery review

Jan 27, 2013 18:10

I am glad I could recognize that Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters was not a good movie, as the majority of critics have agreed, because it means I'm not that Renner-blind. The script's not good. The humor timing's off. It should be more consistently funny but it can't really settle on its tone. In premise, it's very much up my alley--irreverent ( Read more... )

jeremy renner professional life ruiner, hansel and gretel witch hunters

Leave a comment

Comments 26

bethbethbeth January 27 2013, 23:54:22 UTC
Heh...did you read my post? We might as well have cribbed off each other's movie notes. :)

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 00:29:21 UTC
We did channel, didn't we! I won't say, "Ah, the critics just don't like this kind of thing," because even for this kind of thing the script should have been better. But I adored the milk bottles and the diabetes (oh, yes, of course diabetes works that way! :D I so want to write the "How they learned to extract insulin" fanfic) and the freakin' guns and the deadpan f-bomb quips and some of the witch design was quite nice. And it was so much better than Van Helsing because it knew it wasn't to be taken seriously.

(This might have been the first film of his I've seen where he actually had some loving lip-lock. WAIT HOW CAN THAT BE.)

Reply

bethbethbeth January 28 2013, 02:06:28 UTC
There's some smooching and skin in The Unusuals and, um...public events with Scarlett Johansson? Probably Neo Ned (which I haven't seen yet), because his character has an actual girlfriend), but usually there's nothing but a lot of gun-firing metaphors.

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 02:51:33 UTC
Yeah, it took The Unusuals to get him in a regular romantic role! Quelle concept.

(I enjoyed Neo Ned. And I still haven't watched MI:4 because it's, like, my holdout "if I don't watch this I haven't yet exhausted everything" Rennerflick!)

Reply


allisnow January 27 2013, 23:59:08 UTC
*giggles madly* Yes, exactly. I was expecting horrible, and it wasn't horrible, it just wasn't GOOD. But I'll forgive a lot of mediocrity for a little half-nekkid Renner.

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 00:32:11 UTC
Seriously, on a repeat watch, I'm going to be able to look past the places where the dialogue was lame and just enjoy it. (And Jeremy can do so much with what he's given!)

Reply

allisnow January 28 2013, 00:40:33 UTC
You know, Adele's Skyfall come on during the drive over to my folks' and I reflected that if I had to rewatch a movie, I would pick H&G before the aforementioned Bond. Although I'm apparently the only person on the planet who didn't like it...

Renner could read the phone book (do they still make those?) and I would pay $7 to watch him do it.

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 00:52:25 UTC
Oh, god, I thought I was the only one who didn't care for Skyfall! Actually, it's not like I hated it; I had a good time watching it, but it wasn't Bond. Hell yes I want exploding gadgets. I don't want a Bond that's off his game, either. I want nuclear countdowns and western civilization in jeopardy and such.

Reply


ani_bester January 28 2013, 00:09:38 UTC
I'm glad I'm not the only one who enjoyed this movie.
It wasn't good in the sense of being anything more than an popcorn action flick. I was dying when Hansel was drunk, and I did enjoy the fight scenes and over all it was just lots and lots of cheesy fun.

Also, I've decided that they are the first SPN Hunters. I mean how they acted, what they did. it reminded me so much of Sam and Dean and I couldn't help thinking they started it all LOL.
That's my new headcanon.

I did warn family though that this was R for violence. Like no joke violence. People had three year olds at our theater and they watched the whole thing. Each parent to their own way IMHO but there was levels of violence I wouldn't want to explain to my kid, plus the witched IMHO were legit scary... so yeah I don't.

But for older peoples cheesy fun :D

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 00:35:50 UTC
It was fun! I mean, I winced at the very first line of dialogue ("Take them to the forest now,"--now? As opposed to five minutes from now? As opposed to tomorrow? Oof) but the grin almost never left my face through the movie! Not in a so-bad-it's-good way, but in a "Hey, this is fun!" way.

And the violence was so much "action gore" as opposed to "horror gore," it didn't bother me at all. (Horror gore can bother me lots, because it's meant to.)

Reply

allisnow January 28 2013, 00:42:01 UTC
So you were okay with the head-stomping then? I kind of winced at that, even though I was LOLing at the same time.

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 00:53:43 UTC
That was my reaction--wince and LOL. ^_^

Reply


midnitemaraud_r January 28 2013, 00:46:45 UTC
Ha! I thought pretty much the same thing! Massively entertaining for all my B-movie needs. (Although, I also admit to having liked Green Lantern, but mostly because Ryan Reynolds looks hot naked and in CGI green spandex! And being a Sirius Black fan, I clearly like dickish men. :-P)

Also, hello incest, come to me! This review is possibly the best H&G review ever! (note to anyone clicking who hasn't seen the movie for massive spoilers. Although, really, if you watched one trailer, you basically know everything that's going to happen in the movie anyway. :-P)

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 01:53:47 UTC
Oh, god, what a review! Especially regarding the "Pity about that Van Helsing movie taking itself so seriously." So glad you linked that!

And, yes, B-movie needs. SOMETIMES I DO NOT WANT TO SEE "AMOUR." Actually, I'm pretty sure I never want to see "Amour."

Reply


themostepotente January 28 2013, 02:07:05 UTC
Hopefully going to see this next weekend <3

Totally was hoping you'd have a review, too :))))

Reply

amanuensis1 January 28 2013, 02:52:42 UTC
Hee! I almost didn't get there this weekend because of work, but I carved out a couple of hours. FOR RENNER IT'S WORTH IT.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up