Because, as I am on a mission to get my vit. D levels increased so that they get to optimal level (and not stay at less than half of recommended), I am trawling the web for science reports about MS and Vit. D. And I just discovered that it's actually as much as 50 - fifty! - years since the correlation between MS and Vit.D/lack of sunshine was
(
Read more... )
Comments 29
I didn't pay much attention to my low level. I got a prescription, but only took part of it, and forgot to refill. But I will pay more attention next time (my annual is coming up). Thanks! And I hope you are successful both in getting your levels to normal, and in feeling better as a result.
Reply
Reply
There's lots of talk about vitamin D in Canada these days. Somebody's research is finally getting out into the mainstream.
Reply
I'm waiting for New Practitioner to call me about the results, which they said at the office were within normal range, and point out the fact that I'm not going for "normal" here - I'm aiming for optimal. Besides, my "normal" level is too low according to the vit. D council. Why does this have to be so hard?
Reply
I shall also check with my good friend who has MS that she is taking lots of Vitamin D
Reply
Reply
The Times had an interesting article and also the NHS and the MSRC
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5672308.ece
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/02February/Pages/MSandVitaminD.aspx
http://www.msrc.co.uk/index.cfm/days./show/pageid/1334
I'll have to ask my son and daughter in law what they think.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment