Having finished both of Neil Marshall’s films (The Descent and Centurion) close together, I noticed one shortcoming of his style, namely the lack of character development and character depth. What Neil is good at is visual world-building. Both films look good enough to be windows in the real world. But the characters? They don’t seem to be his main
(
Read more... )
Comments 31
(The comment has been removed)
I have nothing against the baths and the sewers, but I feel that the cultures of the lands they were conquering deserved a chance. :D I think I tend to automatically take the side of the weak in any situation.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And I must confess that it is often USA films that do this, consequently, I draw parallels.
Reply
I didn't watched those movies but he's the guy who'll be directing the great episode from season 2 in GoT right? Well at least he won't need the character development. Script has it on its own and his episode will have lots of visual impact more than anything.
khghk I can't wait XD.
Reply
Reply
While I'm interested in the Roman Empire itself and theoretically like lots of fiction about it, in actuality the colonialist mindset involved gets to me too much, and even things that try to be aware of the colonialism involved still tend to default to the Roman POV.
I suppose I'm one of the Fassbender fen, but my main point of referrence for him is The Devil's Whore, where he played against type and was almost the only male character I didn't hate or have contempt for by the end.
Reply
Yes, there is always that feel about Romans-related works. And although I tend to overlook this is non-fiction because it usually just concerns itself with the overall progress, I do grudge it in fiction. Because people were the same everywhere, I am sure. :D
I have only seen a couple of the episodes of "The Devil Whore", and although I though it was a good miniseries (must watch it in full one day!) I can not remember Fassbender to save my life.
Reply
Omg, HERESY!!!!
(just kidding. I do love him so.)
Reply
Reply
I likd him in Centurion, despite the near void of character development. His earnestness (is that a word?) appealed to me. I was SO GLAD that they didn't make too much of the romance. I mean, there could have been a really dreadful and totally gratuitous sex scene in that movie. Instead it held on to its romantic innocence. :)
But yeah, not a great movie. The computer generated blood spatters really started to annoy me after a while. I hope it won't be so obviously fake in this dude's ep of GAME OF THRONES.
Reply
I think he was fine enough in Centurion, and I was even enjoying his role up to a point. Until the romance part came along. The obligatory romance part was just so ridiculous beyond belief that I could not believe my eyes.
I did like the way the movie looked, though. I think Marshall is great at action scenes.
Reply
And fwiw, I don't think I could pick Michael Fassbender out in a police line-up. I'm not even sure if I've seen him in anything other than pictures people on my f-list have posted, but he clearly didn't strike me as the least bit memorable.
Reply
HAHAHAHAHAHA! Your description of Fassbender is v. funny.
Reply
Clearly I need to avoid this thread or I will cry . . .
;)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment