Genreville Posts on UF vs. Horror vs. SF (and a note from Marwa)
As you all know, I'm very much interested in the inspirations for urban fantasy, and where the genre comes from (as well as where it's going). I've read some great articles describing precursors to UF, most of which I intend to riff on over at FlamesRising.com at some point, when I'm actually keeping up with life.
In the mean time, Josh Jasper over at Genreville had a great post this week about using modern, real-world settings in various genres, from horror, to UF, to SF. He writes (among other things):
The trend in what gets called urban fantasy is to set fantasy adventures in current day Earth, only with supernatural creatures either ignored by most of humanity or living in the open somehow. Science fiction tends towards dystopian reflections of current day places that serve to reflect what might happen if we fall down various slippery slope of capitalism, genetic manipulation, and so on. Horror novels seem to use settings as a familiar backdrop against which horrific unfamiliar things happen.
All of this seems fairly accurate to me, but I think the UF novels that do the best job of using the contemporary setting are the ones where the writer actually knows, by heart, the location they're writing about. Sometimes the twisted version of reality is perfectly fun, and sometimes the anonymous dystopian city with magic lends more toward the SF angle, but as much as I love a story, if the main character is able to drive across Boston in a perfectly reasonable amount of time without hitting traffic, then my suspension of disbelief has crashed. (Likewise, referring to areas of Chicago that are not thusly named by the locals, are more of a disjunction to the imagination than vampires, werewolves, or elves.)
So I think you have a few options: one is to twist the setting beyond recognition, one is to have the setting be generic-city representing the twisted reality, and another is to have all of your details so well done that a native to the area will believe in your version of her city. But that's just my take on modern settings in fantasy.
--
On a completely different note, Marwa Rakha, whose novel I linked to last week, is offering her publishing services to others who are having trouble with traditional publishing. You can find more information here.
--
I'll try to be around more this week: we've got an exciting guest blog lined up for Friday! Gail Carriger (gailcarriger) is popping by to talk about the distressing illogic of history and how that lead to Soulless, which releases this week.
In the mean time, Josh Jasper over at Genreville had a great post this week about using modern, real-world settings in various genres, from horror, to UF, to SF. He writes (among other things):
The trend in what gets called urban fantasy is to set fantasy adventures in current day Earth, only with supernatural creatures either ignored by most of humanity or living in the open somehow. Science fiction tends towards dystopian reflections of current day places that serve to reflect what might happen if we fall down various slippery slope of capitalism, genetic manipulation, and so on. Horror novels seem to use settings as a familiar backdrop against which horrific unfamiliar things happen.
All of this seems fairly accurate to me, but I think the UF novels that do the best job of using the contemporary setting are the ones where the writer actually knows, by heart, the location they're writing about. Sometimes the twisted version of reality is perfectly fun, and sometimes the anonymous dystopian city with magic lends more toward the SF angle, but as much as I love a story, if the main character is able to drive across Boston in a perfectly reasonable amount of time without hitting traffic, then my suspension of disbelief has crashed. (Likewise, referring to areas of Chicago that are not thusly named by the locals, are more of a disjunction to the imagination than vampires, werewolves, or elves.)
So I think you have a few options: one is to twist the setting beyond recognition, one is to have the setting be generic-city representing the twisted reality, and another is to have all of your details so well done that a native to the area will believe in your version of her city. But that's just my take on modern settings in fantasy.
--
On a completely different note, Marwa Rakha, whose novel I linked to last week, is offering her publishing services to others who are having trouble with traditional publishing. You can find more information here.
--
I'll try to be around more this week: we've got an exciting guest blog lined up for Friday! Gail Carriger (gailcarriger) is popping by to talk about the distressing illogic of history and how that lead to Soulless, which releases this week.