There are two recurrent and interrelated comments or lines of thought that have cropped up quite often over the years in which I've been trying to do this:
• What is it that you hope to accomplish? What's your goal, your ideal outcome, if your efforts were to succeed?
• Why do we need to identify and "have liberation" for this or that specified
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Reply
ahunter3's message is getting lost in the anger, and recriminations against society as a whole. Some anger should appear in the book, but even there, it needs to be one of many themes, otherwise it will be diatribe that no one will want to read.
A story is not a lecture is not a rant. Every author thinks her work is so important that the publishers and their minions, the editors should drop everything and kowtow to this marvelous story that arrives over the transom, or in hands of an agent. It does not work that way. If it arrives with a lecture on how "important" it is, the editor is likely to look at it as something odious, just based on the argument that arrived with the manuscript.
You've got to find a way to make the editor, whoever she is, want to read the manuscript and go to bat for you as an author. Be persuasive.
Reply
Well, that's not as inconsistent as it may seem (amusing though I find the contrast), since the reviewer is reading the book and you are reading my blog!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment