Yeah, I just saw this terrible "advice" on Yahoo Answers again. And kind of snapped. And ranted. I shall reproduce it here for posterity (because it's entirely possible it will be reported for "abuse"--which I will fight):
Write what you know, yes. And then research the rest. If all we ever wrote about was what we KNEW, I wouldn't have stuck an
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
I always got in trouble for (a) writing stuff I didn't know, like steampunk and pulp action adventures, or (b) writing non-fiction in a fictionalized manner. The former wasn't what I knew, and the latter was "unrealistic." EVEN THOUGH IT ALL HAPPENED.
Reply
If you get a fact wrong in a story, that can be corrected with a little research. But it's so much easier to write if the mechanics of doing so are second nature.
Reply
But then, you do know what you write, because you research...
The science fiction section would be way skinnier if people only wrote what they knew. Fantasy, too.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
A general rule of writing: If you don't know about it, don't write about it. Common sense, really.
I can understand why you would want it to be a real place, so the story seems more "real." But, honestly, just make a place up, based upon the places you know in reality. It can be just as convincing.
And it's not the first time I've seen something like that on YA, where apparently, if you don't know about it firsthand and you have to ask questions about it, then you should just give up and write something else. Or something. "Write what you know" is all fine and good, but taking it way too far (as this useless "answerer" did) is what I'm objecting to here.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Hey, CONduit is starting tomorrow. What's your plan for Friday?
I am on a panel at 1 PM and a panel at 5 PM, otherwise I will do my usual audience lurk on those panels which seem interesting. Haven't figured out yet which ones I will do.
Reply
I need to print out some more business cards. Yay.
Reply
Leave a comment